Difference between revisions of "PTLR Core Papers"

From edegan.com
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Ed
m (Protected "PTLR Core Papers" [edit=brg:move=brg:read=brg])
imported>Ed
Line 14: Line 14:
 
#[[Cockburn Macgarvie (2011) - Entry And Patenting In The Software Industry]]
 
#[[Cockburn Macgarvie (2011) - Entry And Patenting In The Software Industry]]
 
#*[[Cockburn MacGarvie (2006) - Entry And Patenting In The Software Industry]]
 
#*[[Cockburn MacGarvie (2006) - Entry And Patenting In The Software Industry]]
#[[Cockburn Wagner (2007) - Patents And The Survival Of Internet Related Ipos]]
 
 
#[[Entezarkheir (2010) - Patent Thickets And Market Value An Empirical Analysis]]
 
#[[Entezarkheir (2010) - Patent Thickets And Market Value An Empirical Analysis]]
 
#[[Epstein Kuhlik (2004) - Is There A Biomedical Anticommons]]
 
#[[Epstein Kuhlik (2004) - Is There A Biomedical Anticommons]]
Line 58: Line 57:
 
The following papers do not explicitly discuss patent thickets but are vital to an understanding of thickets or their measures:
 
The following papers do not explicitly discuss patent thickets but are vital to an understanding of thickets or their measures:
 
#[[Hall (2005) - A Note On The Bias In Herfindahl Type Measures Based On Count Data]]
 
#[[Hall (2005) - A Note On The Bias In Herfindahl Type Measures Based On Count Data]]
 +
 +
The following papers were erroneously classified as core:
 +
#[[Cockburn Wagner (2007) - Patents And The Survival Of Internet Related Ipos]]
  
 
==Paper Origins==
 
==Paper Origins==

Revision as of 16:55, 21 March 2013

This page details the 'Core' papers of the Patent Thicket Literature Review (PTLR). A paper is 'core' if it explicitly models or studies patent thickets.

Pages containing previous versions of papers are indented below their subsequent version. Write-ups will only be done for the subsequent versions. The BibTex entries for these papers are available as a list on the PTLR Core Group Processed BibTeX page, and each paper page has its own BibTeX entry in its reference section.

The Paper Pages

  1. Clarkson (2004) - Objective Identification Of Patent Thickets A Network Analytic Approach
  2. Clarkson (2005) - Patent Informatics For Patent Thicket Detection
  3. Clarkson DeKorte (2006) - The Problem Of Patent Thickets In Convergent Technologies
  4. Cockburn MacGarvie (2009) - Patents Thickets And The Financing Of Early Stage Firms
  5. Cockburn MacGarvie Muller (2010) - Patent Thickets Licensing And Innovative Performance
  6. Cockburn Macgarvie (2011) - Entry And Patenting In The Software Industry
  7. Entezarkheir (2010) - Patent Thickets And Market Value An Empirical Analysis
  8. Epstein Kuhlik (2004) - Is There A Biomedical Anticommons
  9. Evans LayneFarrar (2004) - Software Patents And Open Source
  10. Farrell (2009) - Intellectual Property As A Bargaining Environment
  11. Galasso Schankerman (2010) - Patent Thickets Courts And The Market For Innovation
  12. George (2006) - What Is Hiding In The Bushes Ebays Effect On Holdout Behavior In Patent Thickets
  13. Geradin (2007) - Royalty Stacking In High Tech Industries Separating Myth From Reality
  14. Geradin LayneFarrar PadillaBlanco (2008) - The Complements Problem Within Standard Setting
  15. Hall (2012) - A Study Of Patent Thickets
  16. Hall Ziedonis (2001) - The Patent Paradox Revisited
  17. Hargreaves (2011) - Digital Opportunity
  18. Harhoff VonGraevenitz Wagner (2012) - Conflict Resolution Public Goods And Patent Thickets
  19. Hegde Mowery Graham (2009) - Pioneering Inventors Or Thicket Builders
  20. Heller Eisenberg (1998) - Can Patents Deter Innovation The Anticommons In Biomedical Research
  21. Huang Murray (2009) - Does Patent Strategy Shape The Long Run Supply Of Public Knowledge
  22. Mann (2004) - The Myth Of The Software Patent Thicket
  23. Merges (1999) - Institutions For Intellectual Property Transactions
  24. Merges Nelson (1990) - On The Complex Economics Of Patent Scope
  25. Mossoff (2009) - A Stitch In Time The Rise And Fall Of The Sewing Machine Patent Thicket
  26. Mossoff (2011) - Rise And Fall Of The First American Patent Thicket
  27. Nagaoka Nishimura (2006) - An Empirical Assessment Of The Effects Of Patent Thickets
  28. Noel Schankerman (2006) - Strategic Patenting And Software Innovation
  29. Regibeau Rockett (2011) - Assessment Of Potential Anticompetitive Conduct
  30. Reitzig (2004) - The Private Values Of Thickets And Fences
  31. Schacht (2006) - Patent Reform Issues In The Biomedical And Software Industries
  32. Shapiro (2001) - Navigating The Patent Thicket
  33. Siebert VonGraevenitz (2010) - Jostling For Advantage Or Not
  34. Siebert VonGraevenitz (2010) - Licensing In The Patent Thicket Timing And Benefits
  35. Sternitzke Bartkowski Schramm (2008) - Visualizing Patent Statistics By Means Of Social Network Analysis Tools
  36. Strandburg (2006) - Law And The Science Of Networks
  37. UKIPO (2011) - Patent Thickets An Overview
  38. VonGraevenitz Wagner Harhoff (2011) - How To Measure Patent Thickets A Novel Approach
  39. VonGraevenitz (2012) - Incidence And Growth Of Patent Thickets
  40. Walsh Arora Cohen (2003) - Effects Of Research Tool Patents And Licensing On Biomedical Innovation
  41. Ziedonis (2004) - Dont Fence Me In

Non-Core Papers

The following papers do not explicitly discuss patent thickets but are vital to an understanding of thickets or their measures:

  1. Hall (2005) - A Note On The Bias In Herfindahl Type Measures Based On Count Data

The following papers were erroneously classified as core:

  1. Cockburn Wagner (2007) - Patents And The Survival Of Internet Related Ipos

Paper Origins

The vast major of these papers were contained in the first download. However, the following four papers were found during the convergence process:

  1. Merges (1999) - Institutions For Intellectual Property Transactions
  2. Merges Nelson (1990) - On The Complex Economics Of Patent Scope
  3. Murray Stern (2007) - Do Formal Intellectual Property Rights Hinder The Free Flow Of Scientific Knowledge
  4. Walsh Arora Cohen (2003) - Effects Of Research Tool Patents And Licensing On Biomedical Innovation

And the following paper was added as it was referenced in the review done by Kirti Gupta, deemed to be directly about thickets, and we didn't have it:

  1. Epstein Kuhlik (2004) - Is There A Biomedical Anticommons