7,649
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Egan (2021) - A Framework for Assessing Municipal High-Growth High-Tech Entrepreneurship Policy.pdf (view source)
Revision as of 12:42, 31 May 2021
, 12:42, 31 May 2021@article{EGAN2021104292, title = {A framework for assessing municipal high-growth high-technology entrepreneurship policy}, journal = {Research Policy}, pages = {104292}, year = {2021}, issn = {0048-7333}, doi = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2021.104292}, url = {https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048733321000937}, author = {Edward J. Egan}, keywords = {Entrepreneurship, Ecosystem, Measurement, High-growth high-technology, Venture capital, Ecosystem support organization, P...
== Summary ==
@article{EGAN2021104292,
title = {A framework for assessing municipal high-growth high-technology entrepreneurship policy},
journal = {Research Policy},
pages = {104292},
year = {2021},
issn = {0048-7333},
doi = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2021.104292},
url = {https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048733321000937},
author = {Edward J. Egan},
keywords = {Entrepreneurship, Ecosystem, Measurement, High-growth high-technology, Venture capital, Ecosystem support organization, Pipeline, Raise rate, Policy cartel},
abstract = {This paper advances a framework for making rudimentary need, impact, and cost–benefit assessments of municipal high-growth high-tech entrepreneurship policy. The framework views ecosystem support organizations like accelerators, incubators, and hubs as components in a city’s venture pipeline. A component’s pipeline size, raise rate, and cost per raise measure its performance. In total, the framework consists of eight objective and reproducible measures based on quantities and qualities of venture capital investment and 16 definitions of related terms-of-the-art. These measures and definitions are illustrated in 26 real-world policy examples, which assess initiatives in Houston and St. Louis over the last 20 years. The examples reveal an enormous variation in welfare effects, and some policies appear welfare destroying. Many non-profit organizations claim success (and win awards and acclaim) using non-standard measures despite performing at less than half benchmark levels. Policy cartels, which control startup policy in many U.S. cities, also engage in non-market actions to protect their rents.}
}
@article{EGAN2021104292,
title = {A framework for assessing municipal high-growth high-technology entrepreneurship policy},
journal = {Research Policy},
pages = {104292},
year = {2021},
issn = {0048-7333},
doi = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2021.104292},
url = {https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048733321000937},
author = {Edward J. Egan},
keywords = {Entrepreneurship, Ecosystem, Measurement, High-growth high-technology, Venture capital, Ecosystem support organization, Pipeline, Raise rate, Policy cartel},
abstract = {This paper advances a framework for making rudimentary need, impact, and cost–benefit assessments of municipal high-growth high-tech entrepreneurship policy. The framework views ecosystem support organizations like accelerators, incubators, and hubs as components in a city’s venture pipeline. A component’s pipeline size, raise rate, and cost per raise measure its performance. In total, the framework consists of eight objective and reproducible measures based on quantities and qualities of venture capital investment and 16 definitions of related terms-of-the-art. These measures and definitions are illustrated in 26 real-world policy examples, which assess initiatives in Houston and St. Louis over the last 20 years. The examples reveal an enormous variation in welfare effects, and some policies appear welfare destroying. Many non-profit organizations claim success (and win awards and acclaim) using non-standard measures despite performing at less than half benchmark levels. Policy cartels, which control startup policy in many U.S. cities, also engage in non-market actions to protect their rents.}
}
