7,649
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Note that there There were three reviewers for the 2nd R&R but Reviewer 2 never returned any comments. Reviewer 1 accepted the paper. Reviewer 3 asked for a revision.
Measuring High-Growth High-Technology Entrepreneurship Ecosystems (view source)
Revision as of 11:59, 10 December 2020
, 11:59, 10 December 2020→2nd R&R
==2nd R&R==
Summarizing reviewer 1's comment comments (i.e., reading between the lines):
*The writing is currently pretty good: '''it is well done'''... '''the paper is polished'''... '''very nicely done'''.
*It The paper works as a whole. The reviewer didn't want anything cut: '''It is a collection of case studies and definitions''', and '''I don't have ... major comments'''.
Reviewer 3's comments are more problematic. As is often the case, I wondered whether the reviewer actually read the paper:
