Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
The Truth Behind Patent Trolls Issue Brief (view source)
Revision as of 15:11, 28 March 2016
, 15:11, 28 March 2016no edit summary
Second, stringent demand letter requirements are not an efficient solution to curbing patent trolls. The proposed reforms against demand letters by the Innovation act are too broad; they have the potential to stifle innovation. Patent owners acting in good faith would not be able to legitimately enforce their patent rights, creating an ineffective patent system and reducing the incentives for innovation. Qualcomm Incorporated, one of the leading companies within the telecommunications sector, manages a portfolio that contains at least 13,000 US patents. As a company that relies on the current patent system to protect its innovations, Qualcomm stated that "the appropriate goal of the legislation should be to identify, and empower the FTC to address, only those demand letters that are sent in bad faith" [http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2015/03/04/demand-letter-legislation-must-be-narrowly-tailored/id=55365/].
==Do we need to empower the FTC?==
==Recommendations on Curbing Patent Troll Activity==
*have courts be more consistent on their rulings and procedures (so not everyone goes to E.D. Texas)
*more specific regulation that targets patent owners acting in bad faith