Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
no edit summary
We are then going to add tags. For the '''up group''' we are going to add the following tags:
*'''abstract''': Make sure it is all on one line with no carriage returns in it and is enclosed in the braces {}.*'''discipline''': 'Policy Report', 'Law', 'Econ', 'Mgmt', 'Biology', 'Physics', etc. Keep a list of the disciplines used (and see below).*'''research_type''': 'Theory' (if there are lots of equations or the paper is developing a written theory), 'Empirical' (if there are regressions), 'Discussion'. You can add two tags seperated by a comma if needed (i.e., Theory,Empirical).*'''industry''': The industry that the empirical results, theory, or discussion apply to, if there is one. Papers that talk about thickets in Nanotech should be classifed as Nanotech, etc.*'''thicket_stance''': Is the paper 'Pro' or 'Anti' the existance of patent thickets? Possible classifications might be: 'Pro', 'Assumed Pro' (for when the paper itself doesn't say that patent thickets exist, but does say that other people say that it exists and it moves forward using this assumption), 'Weakly Pro' (for when it says they might be a problem), 'Neutral', 'None', 'Weakly Anti' (for when it says that they probably aren't a problem), and 'Anti'.*'''thicket_stance_extract''': An extracted section or section of the text (as small as possible) as a single line to provide evidence of the stance*'''thicket_def''': The definition of what a patent thicket is explicitly or implicitly used in the paper. See below.*'''thicket_def_extract''': An extracted section or section of the text (as small as possible) as a single line to provide evidence of the definition*'''tags''': Comma seperated tags to describe what the paper is actually about or its key elements. Examples might be: Pools, Standards, SSOs, Oligopolies, Blocking Patents, etc.
For disciple, it isn't important to make a distinction between policy econ, business econ, and other types of econ. Likewise for management papers. For the thicket definition we are going to want to come up with categorizations of the definitions. I suggest that we keep a running list. Candidates might include 'Diversely-held Complementary Inputs', or 'One Firm With Blocking Patents', etc.
Anonymous user

Navigation menu