Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
14 bytes removed ,  13:42, 21 March 2016
===Overall Credit Loaning to Small Business===
As a result of small banks' overall decline in activity, overall credit loaning to small businesses has taken a hit. *In 2006, the Wall Street Journal [http://www.wsj.com/articles/big-banks-cut-back-on-small-business-1448586637] indicated that the share of small business financing occupied by banks was 60%. Projections from the Wall Street Journal have the current level pinned at about 40%, but the SBA [https://www.sba.gov/sites/default/files/files/sbl_12study.pdf] claims that the figure is closer to 51%. Regardless of the actual number, it is clear that banks' share of small business finance has fallen at an alarming rate. Why? Well, there is limited quantitative research on this particular field. Instead, researchers have been proposing anecdotal theories to explain the stagnation in bank loaning. In a couple of sentences, large banks do not have a proper and comprehensive system of vetting the qualitative assets (non-balance sheet, credit rating) held by small businesses. Consequently, there is no reliable way to ensure that a small business could be a prudent debtor.
Regardless of the actual number, it is clear that banks' share of small business finance has fallen at an alarming rate. Why? Well, there is limited quantitative research on this particular field. Instead, researchers have been proposing anecdotal theories to explain the stagnation in bank loaning. In a couple of sentences, large banks do not have a proper and comprehensive system of vetting the qualitative assets (non-balance sheet, credit rating) held by small businesses. Consequently, there is no reliable way to ensure that a small business could be a prudent debtor.  Considering that banks can easily make loans to proven, solvent large businesses, there is little justification for making smaller investments in riskier assets. In other words, it is difficult to justify taking an additional risk for a smaller reward. Intuitively speaking, this makes sense. This perception *The comparative unattractiveness of loaning to small businesses as inherently riskier than their larger counterparts banks is clearly evident exemplified in a series of surveys conducted by the Harvard Business School [http://www.hbs.edu/faculty/Publication%20Files/15-004_09b1bf8b-eb2a-4e63-9c4e-0374f770856f.pdf] , Small Business Finance Institute [https://www.sbfi.org/capital-views/cre-lending-outlook/2015-cre-lending-outlook-survey/] [https://www.sbfi.org/capital-views/sba-guaranteed-lending-programs/sba-lending-outlook/2016-sba-lending-outlook/] , and the Kauffman Foundation [http://www.goodjobsfirst.org/sites/default/files/docs/pdf/levelfieldreport.pdf]. In each of these surveys, small  Small business owners showed have consistently indicated that they were frustrated with the lack of available credit, and cutthroat competition among their peers to acquire loans; over half of small business surveyed owners felt that they didn't receive enough funding. Meanwhile, most banks indicated continue to indicate satisfaction with the level of credit being extended to small business. A clear void has formed between banks and their small business debtors, and no evident solution currently exists.
== Beyond Bank Loans==
While alternative methods of financing (crowdfunding, online platforms for fundraising, and online term loans) have arisen in the wake of this "credit crunch", they still represent a drop in the bucket. Moreover, these alternative methods are widely unregulated, and are likely to undergo significant changes before they can be deemed as "mainstream" sources of capital generation. In the meantime, small businesses are looking beyond the banking system for a solution.
Anonymous user

Navigation menu