Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
In equilibrium, the game procedes sequentially until nature randomly selects an amender who is in the coalition of the original proposer, when the proposal is approved.
 
====Proof ====
 
Let <math>y^{a}</math> be what proposer (j) keeps for self m members have continuation values offered to <math>V_{j}^{m}(y^{j})</math> be the value of the game to <math>j</math> when <math>y^{j}</math> is on the floor.
 
Note: Stationarity implies that <math>y^{j\ast}</math> will be the same in all recognized rounds.
Note: N members, member 1 is recognized, member j is excluded member recognized, member
 
A: <math>\frac{1-\hat{y}^{a}}{m}\geq \delta V_{i}(y^{i})</math>. This means that the amendment <math>\max V_{i}^{m^{ast}(y_{i}).
<\math>
 
==== Substantive conclusions ====
* Possibility of delay.
* Size of winning coalition can be larger than the minimum winning coalition.
* <math>\frac{\partial m}{\partial \delta}<0</math>. <math>\frac{\partial m}{\partial n}<0</math> (Rui says this needs to be checked.
* More equal because proposer spreads wealth more broadly.
Anonymous user

Navigation menu