Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Acemoglu, Johnson, Robinson (2005) (view source)
Revision as of 14:25, 15 May 2012
, 14:25, 15 May 2012→How does the author rule out alternative hypotheses?
To check the robustness of their results, the authors run specification (2) with a number of additional covariates.
#Add covariate for Protestant Country interacted with year dummies -- either insignificant or marginally significant.
:*-when outcome is ln GDP/capita , Religion dummies are significant, but little impact on differential growth.
#Add average number of years at war variable as many social-scientists via war as an important factor in state building.
:*-Non-significant and no effect on differential growth
#Add dummy for Roman heritage. As many view roots from the roman empire as significant determinant of rise of europe
:*-Insignificant and no effect on differential growth patterns.
#Add interactions between distance from the equator and dates. This is to rule out alternative explanation that economic activity was simply shifting away from the south of Europe and towards the north Atlantic states anyways.
:*-These are typically insignificant