Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
1,819 bytes added ,  14:26, 14 June 2016
=Patent Reform=
==Proposed LegislationReform==
'''Prize System for Inventions'''Some economists and legislators have advocated for a prize system instead of a patent system for pharmaceutical drugs (see [[Medical Innovation Prize Fund Act]]) given the potential for price hiking and deterring R&D in our current patent system.<ref name= "Radical" /> Legislators have proposed bills that provide for prize systems for a small class of drugs (see [[Prize Fund for HIV/AIDS Act]]''':{{#section:Innovation_Act| summary}}). Under this system, companies that invent a new drug will receive a lump sum prize from a pool of up to $3 billion per year and no right to exclude would be awarded to the company. The money for the prize pool would be provided by the federal government and insurance companies. A panel of experts would determine which drug performs the best allowing research to be targeted towards a specific problem. <ref name = "Radical" /> Proponents of the HIV/AIDs Act including Bernie Sanders suggest that the prize system may lower barriers to entry and allow nontraditional parties to participate in finding a needed solution.
'''[[Protecting American Talent and Entrepreneurship (PATENT) Act|PATENT Act]]'''Proposed Prize Systems have taken many forms including: # Opt-in systems where the government pays at least the monopoly profits that the patent holder would expect to receive.# System where patents are exchanged for compensation through an auction.# Offer cash subsidy to consumers who value the patented product more than the marginal cost but cannot afford the patented product at a monopoly price.
'''[[Targeting Rogue Many consider implementing a federal prize system for inventions to be impractical for several reasons. Determining both the criteria for award winning products and Opaque Letters (TROL) Act|TROL Act]]'''the valuation of each winning drug may pose a significant challenge. Suggestions include valuation based on social value, lifestyle improvement, or medical necessity. Additionally, awarding a prize too early may dissuade companies from commercializing products or pursuing R&D. Completely eliminating bias from the panel that decides awards may prove impossible and therefore decrease the competition needed to make the system work. <ref name="BU"/>
'''[[Support Technology and Research for Our Nation’s Growth (STRONG) Patents Act|STRONG Patents Innovation Act]]''':{{#section:Innovation_Act| summary}}
'''[[Demand Letter Transparency Protecting American Talent and Entrepreneurship (PATENT) Act]]''' '''[[Innovation Protection |PATENT Act]]'''
==Future Legislation==

Navigation menu