133
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
@article{acs_knowledge_2009, title = {The knowledge spillover theory of entrepreneurship}, volume = {32}, issn = {0921-898X, 1573-0913}, url = {https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11187-008-9157-3}, doi = {10.1007/s11187-008-9157-3}, abstract = {Contemporary theories of entrepreneurship generally focus on the recognition of opportunities and the decision to exploit them. Although the entrepreneurship literature treats opportunities as exogenous, the prevailing theory of economic growth suggests they are endogenous. This paper advances the microeconomic foundations of endogenous growth theory by developing a knowledge spillover theory of entrepreneurship. Knowledge created endogenously results in knowledge spillovers, which allow entrepreneurs to identify and exploit opportunities.}, language = {en}, number = {1}, urldate = {2017-11-10}, journal = {Small Business Economics}, author = {Acs, Zoltan J. and Braunerhjelm, Pontus and Audretsch, David B. and Carlsson, Bo}, month = jan, year = {2009}, pages = {15--30} Corporate Growth Convergence in Europe by Paul Geroski and Klaus Gugler @article{geroski_corporate_2004, title = {Corporate {Growth} {Convergence} in {Europe}}, volume = {56}, issn = {0030-7653}, url = {http://www.jstor.org/stable/3488800}, abstract = {It is widely believed that the implementation of the Single Market Programme in 1992 has induced a transformation in industrial structures across Europe. Some people believe that it has driven Europe towards a common industrial structure. However, using a newly available database covering nearly every firm above 100 employees in 14 European countries over the time period 1994 to 1998, the hypothesis of convergence in corporate sizes within industries is unambiguously rejected by the data. A Gibrat process best describes the growth of very large and mature firms, but smaller and younger firms depart from this prediction. Pre-post 1992 comparisons using another database for larger listed firms reveal that the speed of convergence actually decreased post-1992.}, number = {4}, urldate = {2017-11-10}, journal = {Oxford Economic Papers}, author = {Geroski, Paul and Gugler, Klaus}, year = {2004}, pages = {597--620} Regional Advantage by AnnaLee Saxenian @misc{noauthor_regional_nodate, title = {Regional {Advantage} — {AnnaLee} {Saxenian} {\textbar} {Harvard} {University} {Press}}, url = {http://www.hup.harvard.edu/catalog.php?isbn=9780674753402}, abstract = {Why is it that business in California's Silicon Valley flourished while along Route 128 in Massachusetts declined in the 90s? The answer, Saxenian suggests, has to do with the fact that despite similar histories and technologies, Silicon Valley developed a decentralized but cooperative industrial system while Route 128 came to be dominated by independent, self-sufficient corporations. The result of more than one hundred interviews, this compelling analysis highlights the importance of local sources of competitive advantage in a volatile world economy.}, urldate = {2017-11-10}
Startup Density Literature Review (view source)
Revision as of 16:41, 10 November 2017
, 16:41, 10 November 2017no edit summary
keywords = {Agglomeration, Foreign direct investment},
pages = {223--247}
==GIS mapping==
Geography, Industrial Organization, and Agglomeration by Stuart S. Rosenthal and William C. Strange. Cited by 1238. Fit in category (2) and (3)
