Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Giannetti Simonov (2009) - Social Interactions And Entrepreneurial Activity (view source)
Revision as of 18:59, 26 June 2011
, 18:59, 26 June 2011New page: *This page is referenced in The NBER Entrepreneurship Research Boot Camp Page ==Reference(s)== ...
*This page is referenced in [[Entrepreneurship_Research_Boot_Camp#The_Empirics_of_Entrepreneurial_Venture_Creation | The NBER Entrepreneurship Research Boot Camp Page]]
==Reference(s)==
*Giannetti, Mariassunta, and Andrei Simonov (2009), "Social interactions and entrepreneurial activity", Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, 18, 665-709. [http://www.edegan.com/pdfs/Giannetti%20Simonov%20(2009)%20-%20Social%20Interactions%20And%20Entrepreneurial%20Activity.pdf pdf]
==Abstract==
We show that individuals residing in highly entrepreneurial neighborhoods are more likely to become entrepreneurs and invest more into their own businesses, even though their entrepreneurial profits are lower and their alternative job opportunities more attractive. Our results suggest that peer effects create nonpecuniary benefits from entrepreneurial activity and play an important role in the decision to become an entrepreneur. Alternative explanations, such as entry costs, social learning, and informal credit markets, are not supported by the data.
==Reference(s)==
*Giannetti, Mariassunta, and Andrei Simonov (2009), "Social interactions and entrepreneurial activity", Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, 18, 665-709. [http://www.edegan.com/pdfs/Giannetti%20Simonov%20(2009)%20-%20Social%20Interactions%20And%20Entrepreneurial%20Activity.pdf pdf]
==Abstract==
We show that individuals residing in highly entrepreneurial neighborhoods are more likely to become entrepreneurs and invest more into their own businesses, even though their entrepreneurial profits are lower and their alternative job opportunities more attractive. Our results suggest that peer effects create nonpecuniary benefits from entrepreneurial activity and play an important role in the decision to become an entrepreneur. Alternative explanations, such as entry costs, social learning, and informal credit markets, are not supported by the data.
