Difference between revisions of "Ben Baldazo (Research Plans)"

From edegan.com
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 11: Line 11:
 
*Finding and Documenting the processes required to run the R code may be necessary
 
*Finding and Documenting the processes required to run the R code may be necessary
 
*Works on Carto and looks really cool
 
*Works on Carto and looks really cool
 +
*We do eventually need to have a plug in and a Carto account so that we can post this on the Wiki
  
 
'''Accelerator Quality Issue Brief'''
 
'''Accelerator Quality Issue Brief'''
Line 16: Line 17:
 
Factors to look at
 
Factors to look at
 
*Market vs Non-Market
 
*Market vs Non-Market
 +
**Philanthropic funding?
 +
**Founded Bottom up? or Top down?
 
*Location
 
*Location
 +
*Available Resources
 +
**Flex Space
 +
**Events
 +
**Co-Working
 +
**Connections/Mentorship
 +
***This can also have a judged value based on Mentor/Connection perceived experiece
 +
**Proximity
 +
**Funding
 +
**Userbase
 
*Leadership/Experience qualifications
 
*Leadership/Experience qualifications
 +
**Have they driven a startup before or been in backseat
 +
**What other qualifications do they have
 
*Criteria from the Acc Rankings
 
*Criteria from the Acc Rankings
 
**VC funding history
 
**VC funding history
Line 23: Line 37:
 
**Acquired
 
**Acquired
 
*Any other reviews possible
 
*Any other reviews possible
 +
**Other articles
 +
**Info from actually calling the accelerators
 +
**perhaps reviews from startups themselves
 +
***Could look specifically into startups that have gone through multiple accelerators

Revision as of 11:55, 18 July 2016


Ben Baldazo Research Plans (Plan Page)

Startups of Houston Interactive Maps - The Whole Process

Use Google Maps to find Longitude and Latitude

  • Document how to work Geocode.py and what might go wrong

Put through R code to make an interactive map

  • Finding and Documenting the processes required to run the R code may be necessary
  • Works on Carto and looks really cool
  • We do eventually need to have a plug in and a Carto account so that we can post this on the Wiki

Accelerator Quality Issue Brief

Factors to look at

  • Market vs Non-Market
    • Philanthropic funding?
    • Founded Bottom up? or Top down?
  • Location
  • Available Resources
    • Flex Space
    • Events
    • Co-Working
    • Connections/Mentorship
      • This can also have a judged value based on Mentor/Connection perceived experiece
    • Proximity
    • Funding
    • Userbase
  • Leadership/Experience qualifications
    • Have they driven a startup before or been in backseat
    • What other qualifications do they have
  • Criteria from the Acc Rankings
    • VC funding history
    • IPO
    • Acquired
  • Any other reviews possible
    • Other articles
    • Info from actually calling the accelerators
    • perhaps reviews from startups themselves
      • Could look specifically into startups that have gone through multiple accelerators