Difference between revisions of "P. Anderson and M. Tushman: Technological Discontinuities and Dominant Design: A Cyclical Model of Technological Change."

From edegan.com
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Moshe
imported>Moshe
Line 1: Line 1:
 
Return to [[BPP Field Exam Papers 2012]]
 
Return to [[BPP Field Exam Papers 2012]]
 +
 +
===Theory===
 +
The authors propose a cyclical model of technological change.  In their model, A technological discontinuity occurs followed by an era of ferment which is characterized by design competition and substitution.  Next, a dominant design emerges, and an era of incremental change follows.  This era is characterized by elaboration of dominant design.
  
 
===Hypothesis===
 
===Hypothesis===
The authors propose a cyclical model of technological change.  In their model, A technological discontinuity occurs followed by an era of ferment which is characterized by design competition and substitution.  Next, a dominant design emerges, and an era of incremental change follows.  This era is characterized by elaboration of dominant design.
+
#

Revision as of 23:52, 23 May 2012

Return to BPP Field Exam Papers 2012

Theory

The authors propose a cyclical model of technological change. In their model, A technological discontinuity occurs followed by an era of ferment which is characterized by design competition and substitution. Next, a dominant design emerges, and an era of incremental change follows. This era is characterized by elaboration of dominant design.

Hypothesis