Difference between revisions of "Information Asymmetry Measures"

From edegan.com
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Ed
imported>Ed
Line 1: Line 1:
This page is referenced in:
 
*VC Acquisitions Paper
 
 
This page provides a summary details from the [[Information Asymmetry in Acquisitions Lit Review]] and the begining of the build notes for these variables.
 
 
 
This page is referenced in:  
 
This page is referenced in:  
 
*VC Acquisitions Paper  
 
*VC Acquisitions Paper  
Line 120: Line 115:
 
===Paper Codes===
 
===Paper Codes===
  
The paper codes are as follows:
+
The paper codes are as follows (where 'ea' denotes et al.):
  
 
  '''Code  Paper'''
 
  '''Code  Paper'''
  AL00   Aboody and Lev 2000
+
  AL00   Aboody and Lev 2000
 
  Aea02  Affleck-Graves et al. 2002
 
  Aea02  Affleck-Graves et al. 2002
 
  Aea90  Amihud et al 1990
 
  Aea90  Amihud et al 1990
  AB94   Atiase and Bamber 1994
+
  AB94   Atiase and Bamber 1994
  BC11   Basu and Chevrier 2011
+
  BC11   Basu and Chevrier 2011
  BR91   Brown and Ryngaert 1991
+
  BR91   Brown and Ryngaert 1991
  CL87   Calvet and Lefoll 1987
+
  CL87   Calvet and Lefoll 1987
  CS07   Capron and Shen 2007
+
  CS07   Capron and Shen 2007
 
  Cea04  Carrow et al. 2004
 
  Cea04  Carrow et al. 2004
  C98   Chang 1998
+
  C98     Chang 1998
  CS01   Clarke and Shastri 2001
+
  CS01   Clarke and Shastri 2001
  D91   Dierkens 1991
+
  D91     Dierkens 1991
  ET00   Eckbo and Thorburn 2000
+
  ET00   Eckbo and Thorburn 2000
 
  Eea90  Eckbo et al 1990
 
  Eea90  Eckbo et al 1990
  ES99   Emery and Switzer 1999
+
  ES99   Emery and Switzer 1999
  FL04   Frankel and Li (2004)
+
  FL04   Frankel and Li 2004
 
  Fea02  Fuller et al. 2002
 
  Fea02  Fuller et al. 2002
  KS99   Krishnaswami and Subramaniam 1999
+
  KS99   Krishnaswami and Subramaniam 1999
  L92   Lee (1992)
+
  L92     Lee 1992
  LT07   Lobo and Tung 1997
+
  LT07   Lobo and Tung 1997
  M96   Martin 1996
+
  M96     Martin 1996
 
  Mea07  Moeller et al. 2007
 
  Mea07  Moeller et al. 2007
  O07   Officer (2007)
+
  O07     Officer 2007
 
  Oea09  Officer et al. 2009
 
  Oea09  Officer et al. 2009
  T10   Tetlock 2010
+
  T10     Tetlock 2010
  T02   Thomas (2002)
+
  T02     Thomas 2002
  UC97   Utama and Cready 1997
+
  UC97   Utama and Cready 1997
  Y03   Yook 2003
+
  Y03     Yook 2003
 +
 
 +
==Summary Of Usage==
 +
 
 +
There are 28 papers and 33 distinct variables broken into 8 distinct categories: Price/Vol, Analyst, News, CapX, Accounting, External, Transaction, and Target. '''Market Microstructure''' papers and measures are excluded from the summary and tabulation but included in [[Information Asymmetry in Acquisitions Lit Review]] with comments.
 +
 
 +
The average paper uses 2.8 variables from 1.7 categories. The most variables and categories covered by a single paper are 9 and 4 respectively, for Tetlock 2010.
 +
 
 +
Method of payment measures (cash vs. stock) are most popular, and present in half of all papers covered. Other transaction characteristics are rarely used. Acccounting-based measures, particularly Tobin's Q, and Analyst Forecast measures, particularly the Std. Dev. of Forecasts, are the next most popular and occur in approximately 1/3rd of all papers covered. Price/Volumet measures, particularly the idiosyncratic volatility, are the next most popular, occuring in approximately 1/5th of all papers covered.

Revision as of 18:35, 25 July 2012

This page is referenced in:

  • VC Acquisitions Paper

This page provides a summary details from the Information Asymmetry in Acquisitions Lit Review and the begining of the build notes for these variables.

Table of Measure Usage

In a review of 28 papers that used one or more information asymmetry measures to explain stock price events (acquisitions, earning announcements, diversitures, etc.), the following measures were found:

D91 CS01 Mea07 KS99 FL04 O07 L92 T02 Aea02 AB94 LT07 T10 UC97 Oea09 M96 ES99 AL00 Y03 CS07 Cea04 Others* Count
Price/Volume Metrics y y y y y y y y 8
Idiosyncratic Volatility y y y y y 5
R-Squared from Earnings, Book Val. On Price y 1
Momentum y 1
Stock Illiquidity y 1
Pre-CAR y 1
Ratio of shares traded to outstanding y y 2
Abnormal/Unexpected Turnover y y 2
Analyst Forecasts y y y y y y y y y y 10
Forecast Error y y y y 4
Std. Dev. Of Forecasts y y y y y y y y 8
Normalized Forecast Error y y 2
Range of Forecasts y y 2
No. Estimates y 1
No. Analysts y y y 3
News y y y 3
News Announcements Y y y 3
Capital Structure y y y y y y 6
Breadth of Ownership/Block Holdings y y 2
Institutional Ownership/Holdings y y 2
Managerial Holdings y 1
No. Wholy Owned Subs. y 1
Accounting-based Measures y y y y y y y y y y 10
Market-to-Book-Assets (or Q) y y y y y y y 7
Market-to-Book-Equity y 1
Earnings to Price Ratio y 1
Firm Size y y 2
Development Stage (Sales<0.5b) y 1
R&D Expenditure y y 2
Ratio of R&D to Sales y 1
Intangible Assets y 1
Ratio of Intangible Assets y 1
Sales Growth y 1
External Responses y 1
Ratings Change y 1
Transaction Characteristics y y y y y y +8 14
Method of Payment y y y y y +7 12
Diversification/Related y y 2
Acquirer Experience y y 2
Distance between A&T +1 1
Target Characteristics y 1
Target Age y 1

Note that C98, Eea90, Aea90, BR91, Fea02, ET00, and CL87 (not listed above) all used payment method only, and BC11 used a distance measure.

Paper Codes

The paper codes are as follows (where 'ea' denotes et al.):

Code   Paper
AL00    Aboody and Lev 2000
Aea02   Affleck-Graves et al. 2002
Aea90   Amihud et al 1990
AB94    Atiase and Bamber 1994
BC11    Basu and Chevrier 2011
BR91    Brown and Ryngaert 1991
CL87    Calvet and Lefoll 1987
CS07    Capron and Shen 2007
Cea04   Carrow et al. 2004
C98     Chang 1998
CS01    Clarke and Shastri 2001
D91     Dierkens 1991
ET00    Eckbo and Thorburn 2000
Eea90   Eckbo et al 1990
ES99    Emery and Switzer 1999
FL04    Frankel and Li 2004
Fea02   Fuller et al. 2002
KS99    Krishnaswami and Subramaniam 1999
L92     Lee 1992
LT07    Lobo and Tung 1997
M96     Martin 1996
Mea07   Moeller et al. 2007
O07     Officer 2007
Oea09   Officer et al. 2009
T10     Tetlock 2010
T02     Thomas 2002
UC97    Utama and Cready 1997
Y03     Yook 2003

Summary Of Usage

There are 28 papers and 33 distinct variables broken into 8 distinct categories: Price/Vol, Analyst, News, CapX, Accounting, External, Transaction, and Target. Market Microstructure papers and measures are excluded from the summary and tabulation but included in Information Asymmetry in Acquisitions Lit Review with comments.

The average paper uses 2.8 variables from 1.7 categories. The most variables and categories covered by a single paper are 9 and 4 respectively, for Tetlock 2010.

Method of payment measures (cash vs. stock) are most popular, and present in half of all papers covered. Other transaction characteristics are rarely used. Acccounting-based measures, particularly Tobin's Q, and Analyst Forecast measures, particularly the Std. Dev. of Forecasts, are the next most popular and occur in approximately 1/3rd of all papers covered. Price/Volumet measures, particularly the idiosyncratic volatility, are the next most popular, occuring in approximately 1/5th of all papers covered.