Difference between revisions of "Hillary Clinton (Middle East)"

From edegan.com
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Iris
(New page: Clinton's Middle East (section page): *'''No-fly zone in Syria, but no American troops on the ground''' **We don't want American...)
 
imported>Iris
Line 1: Line 1:
 
[[Hillary Clinton|Clinton's]] [[Middle East]] [[Hillary Clinton (Middle East)| (section page)]]:
 
[[Hillary Clinton|Clinton's]] [[Middle East]] [[Hillary Clinton (Middle East)| (section page)]]:
  
*'''No-fly zone in Syria, but no American troops on the ground'''
+
*'''No-fly zone in Syria, but no American troops on the ground''' [http://www.ontheissues.org/2016/Hillary_Clinton_War_+_Peace.htm#Middle_East]
**We don't want American troops on the ground in Syria. We had to put together a coalition, and that it should include Arabs, people in the region.
+
**We don't want American troops on the ground in Syria. We had to put together a coalition, and that it should include Arabs, people in the region. [http://www.ontheissues.org/2016/Hillary_Clinton_War_+_Peace.htm#Middle_East]
 
**We are already flying in Syria just as we are flying in Iraq. I have advocated that the no-fly zone--which of course would be in a coalition--be put on the table, to figure out what leverage we have to get Russia to the table. Diplomacy is not about the perfect solution; it's about how you balance the risks. (DD1) [http://www.ontheissues.org/2016/Hillary_Clinton_War_+_Peace.htm#Middle_East]
 
**We are already flying in Syria just as we are flying in Iraq. I have advocated that the no-fly zone--which of course would be in a coalition--be put on the table, to figure out what leverage we have to get Russia to the table. Diplomacy is not about the perfect solution; it's about how you balance the risks. (DD1) [http://www.ontheissues.org/2016/Hillary_Clinton_War_+_Peace.htm#Middle_East]
  
*'''Not helping Free Syrian Army left vacuum for ISIS to fill'''
+
*'''Not helping Free Syrian Army left vacuum for ISIS to fill''' [http://www.ontheissues.org/2016/Hillary_Clinton_War_+_Peace.htm#Middle_East]
 
**The failure to help build up a credible fighting force of the people who were the originators of the protests against Assad---there were Islamists, there were secularists, there was everything in the middle---the failure to do that left a big vacuum, which the jihadists have now filled. (Source: Jeffrey Goldberg in The Atlantic , Aug 10, 2014 ) [http://www.ontheissues.org/2016/Hillary_Clinton_War_+_Peace.htm#Middle_East]
 
**The failure to help build up a credible fighting force of the people who were the originators of the protests against Assad---there were Islamists, there were secularists, there was everything in the middle---the failure to do that left a big vacuum, which the jihadists have now filled. (Source: Jeffrey Goldberg in The Atlantic , Aug 10, 2014 ) [http://www.ontheissues.org/2016/Hillary_Clinton_War_+_Peace.htm#Middle_East]

Revision as of 14:28, 27 January 2016

Clinton's Middle East (section page):

  • No-fly zone in Syria, but no American troops on the ground [1]
    • We don't want American troops on the ground in Syria. We had to put together a coalition, and that it should include Arabs, people in the region. [2]
    • We are already flying in Syria just as we are flying in Iraq. I have advocated that the no-fly zone--which of course would be in a coalition--be put on the table, to figure out what leverage we have to get Russia to the table. Diplomacy is not about the perfect solution; it's about how you balance the risks. (DD1) [3]
  • Not helping Free Syrian Army left vacuum for ISIS to fill [4]
    • The failure to help build up a credible fighting force of the people who were the originators of the protests against Assad---there were Islamists, there were secularists, there was everything in the middle---the failure to do that left a big vacuum, which the jihadists have now filled. (Source: Jeffrey Goldberg in The Atlantic , Aug 10, 2014 ) [5]