Difference between revisions of "Klein Crawford Alchian (1978) - Vertical Integration Appropriable Rents And The Competitive Contracting Process"

From edegan.com
Jump to navigation Jump to search
 
Line 1: Line 1:
 
{{Article
 
{{Article
 
|Has page=Klein Crawford Alchian (1978) - Vertical Integration Appropriable Rents And The Competitive Contracting Process
 
|Has page=Klein Crawford Alchian (1978) - Vertical Integration Appropriable Rents And The Competitive Contracting Process
|Has title=Vertical Integration Appropriable Rents And The Competitive Contracting Process
+
|Has bibtex key=
 +
|Has article title=Vertical Integration Appropriable Rents And The Competitive Contracting Process
 
|Has author=Klein Crawford Alchian
 
|Has author=Klein Crawford Alchian
 
|Has year=1978
 
|Has year=1978

Latest revision as of 18:15, 29 September 2020

Article
Has bibtex key
Has article title Vertical Integration Appropriable Rents And The Competitive Contracting Process
Has author Klein Crawford Alchian
Has year 1978
In journal
In volume
In number
Has pages
Has publisher
© edegan.com, 2016

Reference(s)

Klein, Benjamin Robert, G. Crawford, and Armen A. Alchian (1978), "Vertical Integration, Appropriable Rents, and the Competitive Contracting Process", Journal of Law and Economics, Vol. 21, No. 2. (Oct.), pp. 297-326 pdf

@article{klein1978vertical,
  title={Vertical integration, appropriable rents, and the competitive contracting process},
  author={Klein, Benjamin and Crawford, Robert G and Alchian, Armen A},
  journal={Journal of law and economics},
  volume={21},
  number={2},
  pages={297--326},
  year={1978},
  publisher={JSTOR}
}

Abstract

More than forty years have passed since Coase's fundamental insight that transaction, coordination, and contracting costs must be considered ex- plicitly in explaining the extent of vertical integration.' Starting from the truism that profit-maximizing firms will undertake those activities that they find cheaper to administer internally than to purchase in the market, Coase forced economists to begin looking for previously neglected constraints on the trading process that might efficiently lead to an intrafirm rather than an interfirm transaction. This paper attempts to add to this literature by explor- ing one particular cost of using the market system-the possibility of post- contractual opportunistic behavior.