Difference between revisions of "Leung Sharkey (2009) - Out Of Sight Out Of Mind The Mere Labeling Effect Of Multi Category Membership In Markets"

From edegan.com
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Ed
(New page: *This page is referenced in The NBER Entrepreneurship Research Boot Camp Page ==Reference(s)== *Leun...)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
 +
{{Article
 +
|Has page=
 +
|Has title=
 +
|Has author=
 +
|Has year=
 +
|In journal=
 +
|In volume=
 +
|In number=
 +
|Has pages=
 +
|Has publisher=
 +
}}
 
*This page is referenced in [[Entrepreneurship_Research_Boot_Camp#Sociological_Approaches_to_Entrepreneurship | The NBER Entrepreneurship Research Boot Camp Page]]
 
*This page is referenced in [[Entrepreneurship_Research_Boot_Camp#Sociological_Approaches_to_Entrepreneurship | The NBER Entrepreneurship Research Boot Camp Page]]
  

Revision as of 11:48, 29 September 2020

Article
Has bibtex key
Has article title
Has year
In journal
In volume
In number
Has pages
Has publisher
© edegan.com, 2016

Reference(s)

  • Leung, Ming D., and Amanda J. Sharkey (2009), "Out of sight, out of mind: The mere labeling effect of multi-category membership in markets" pdf

Abstract

Extant work shows that actors who span multiple social categories are devalued relative to their more specialized peers. Two reasons have been proffered: 1) category spanners are of lower-quality or, 2) category spanners are difficult to understand and therefore ignored. It has been challenging for extant work to disentangle these two. This paper tackles this issue by employing a natural experiment on a peer-to-peer lending website. Difference in difference analyses show that, regardless of underlying ability or quality, perceptions of category spanning can result in devaluation.