Difference between revisions of "Acemoglu and Pischke (1998)"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Article | {{Article | ||
|Has page=Acemoglu and Pischke (1998) | |Has page=Acemoglu and Pischke (1998) | ||
− | |Has title= | + | |Has bibtex key= |
− | |Has author= | + | |Has article title= |
− | |Has year= | + | |Has author=Acemoglu and Pischke |
+ | |Has year=1998 | ||
|In journal= | |In journal= | ||
|In volume= | |In volume= |
Latest revision as of 18:14, 29 September 2020
Article | |
---|---|
Has bibtex key | |
Has article title | |
Has author | Acemoglu and Pischke |
Has year | 1998 |
In journal | |
In volume | |
In number | |
Has pages | |
Has publisher | |
© edegan.com, 2016 |
Theory Questions:
- What is the author's hypothesis?
- How does the author test the hypothesis?
- How does the author rule out alternative hypotheses?
- How might these tests be run if one had quantitative evidence?
- What problems might arise in this quantitative analysis?
Empirical Questions:
- What's the author's hypothesis?
- How it is tested?
- What do the tests achieve?
- How could the tests be improved?
- What are the tests' strengths and weaknesses?
- Can you think of any alternative empirical tests?