Difference between revisions of "La Porta et al (2008)"

From edegan.com
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Bo
(New page: * What is the author's hypothesis? * How does the author test the hypothesis? * How does the author rule out alternative hypotheses? * How might these tests be run if one had quantitati...)
 
 
(5 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 +
{{Article
 +
|Has page=La Porta et al (2008)
 +
|Has bibtex key=
 +
|Has article title=
 +
|Has author=La Porta et al
 +
|Has year=2008
 +
|In journal=
 +
|In volume=
 +
|In number=
 +
|Has pages=
 +
|Has publisher=
 +
}}
 +
Theory Questions:
 
* What is the author's hypothesis?  
 
* What is the author's hypothesis?  
 
* How does the author test the hypothesis?  
 
* How does the author test the hypothesis?  
Line 4: Line 17:
 
* How might these tests be run if one had quantitative evidence?  
 
* How might these tests be run if one had quantitative evidence?  
 
* What problems might arise in this quantitative analysis?
 
* What problems might arise in this quantitative analysis?
 +
 +
Empirical Questions:
 +
* What's the author's hypothesis?
 +
* How it is tested?
 +
* What do the tests achieve?
 +
* How could the tests be improved?
 +
* What are the tests' strengths and weaknesses?
 +
* Can you think of any alternative empirical tests?

Latest revision as of 18:15, 29 September 2020

Article
Has bibtex key
Has article title
Has author La Porta et al
Has year 2008
In journal
In volume
In number
Has pages
Has publisher
© edegan.com, 2016

Theory Questions:

  • What is the author's hypothesis?
  • How does the author test the hypothesis?
  • How does the author rule out alternative hypotheses?
  • How might these tests be run if one had quantitative evidence?
  • What problems might arise in this quantitative analysis?

Empirical Questions:

  • What's the author's hypothesis?
  • How it is tested?
  • What do the tests achieve?
  • How could the tests be improved?
  • What are the tests' strengths and weaknesses?
  • Can you think of any alternative empirical tests?