Difference between revisions of "VC Bargaining"
imported>Ed |
imported>Ed |
||
Line 35: | Line 35: | ||
Address the question: How does the optimal policy compare to the current way of calculating shares and values? | Address the question: How does the optimal policy compare to the current way of calculating shares and values? | ||
− | Assume a fixed number of rounds: t={1,2} | + | Assume a fixed number of rounds: <math>t={1,2}\,</math> |
− | Assume a fixed total investment: \sum_t x_t = 1 | + | Assume a fixed total investment: <math>\sum_t x_t = 1\,</math> |
− | Assume a functional form for f(x_t): f(x_t) = ln (x_t) | + | Assume a functional form for <math>f(x_t): f(x_t) = ln (x_t)\,</math> |
+ | |||
+ | Again <math> V(0)=0 \,</math>. | ||
+ | |||
+ | :<math> \therefore V_2 = ln(x_1) + ln(x_2)\,</math> |
Revision as of 20:07, 25 May 2011
This page (and the discussion page) is for Ed and Ron to share their thoughts on VC Bargaining. Access is restricted to those with "Trusted" access.
Contents
A Basic Model
The players
The players are an Entrepreneur and a VC, both are risk neutral.
The Value Function
- [math]V_t=V_{t-1} + f(x_t) - k \,[/math]
with
- [math]V_0=0, f(0)=0, f'\gt 0, f''\lt 0, k\gt 0 \,[/math]
Having [math]k\gt 0\,[/math] forces a finite number of rounds as the optimal solution providing there is a stopping constraint on [math]V_t\,[/math] (so players don't invest forever).
One possible stopping constraint is:
- [math]V_t \ge \overline{V}\,[/math]
with
- [math]\overline{V} \sim F(V)\,[/math]
where the distribution is known to both parties.
Bargaining
In each period there is Rubenstein finite bargaining, with potentially different patience, and one player designated as last. This will give a single period equilibrium outcome with the parties having different bargaining strength.
Simple First Steps
Address the question: How does the optimal policy compare to the current way of calculating shares and values?
Assume a fixed number of rounds: [math]t={1,2}\,[/math] Assume a fixed total investment: [math]\sum_t x_t = 1\,[/math] Assume a functional form for [math]f(x_t): f(x_t) = ln (x_t)\,[/math]
Again [math] V(0)=0 \,[/math].
- [math] \therefore V_2 = ln(x_1) + ln(x_2)\,[/math]