Tag: Austin

Categories
McNair Center Rice Entrepreneurs Startup Ecosystems

How to Make Texas More Startup-friendly

profileOver the last decade, Blake Commager (@commagere) has raised over $12 million in venture capital funding, started seven companies and sold five—including the first version of Facebook Causes and some of the most popular apps on Facebook, such as Zombies and Vampires. Born and raised in Midland, Texas, Commager graduated from Rice in 1999 and moved to the San Francisco Bay Area in 2003.

Commagere is the CEO of MediaSpike and an angel investor, advising several startups in the Bay Area. His varied experience in the tech startup space, from founder to investor and mentor, gives him a comprehensive perspective on the Silicon Valley startup ecosystem. As Commagere worked at a startup and tried to start a company in Austin before moving out to Silicon Valley, I was interested in learning why he chose to move out to the Bay Area and what Texas could do to better support startups.

Iris Huang: What brought you to the Silicon Valley?

Blake Commagere: I had always been interested in solving the problem of address book updating. In 2003, a friend of mine and I were working on our own company in Austin, and while doing competitive analysis, we found out Plaxo, a startup in Mountain View, California, was trying to solve the same problem. I liked their solution and they already had funding so I moved here to join the company.

I also felt the pressure to move to the Bay Area. By virtue of having a high concentration of tech talent, the Bay Area created a gravitational pull for even more tech talent. You see that with a lot of industries—they blow up largely in a few cities and as the ecosystem develops around them, the momentum increases, which makes it harder for other cities to compete. The more talent it has, the more successful the industry becomes in the region, the more new talent comes. The concentration of talent creates a virtuous cycle—in the Bay Area, the former successful startup founders become the next generation angel investors and venture capitalists, who fund and help more startups succeed.

The concentration of talent in the Bay Area has two main advantages:

The sheer concentration of talent and ecosystem make the process of building a startup easier, not a lot easier, but even if it’s just 2 percent easier, that makes all the difference. Given how hard it is to build a company, anything that makes it a little easier can be incredibly important. The high concentration of talent in the Bay Area makes it easier for startups to hire good employees. Startups will also have an easier time meeting people who can provide advice and introduce them to investors.

The large tech community in the Bay Area also provides a lot of emotional support, which turns out to be extremely important for startup founders. What’s unique about entrepreneurship is the combination of the high level of stress and lack of experience and resources. It’s very intimidating as an entrepreneur when you have a dozen things you have to do today but you have no idea how to do any of them. No business school teaches you what you need at a startup day to day. Sometimes other founders can’t help you either, but at least, you can commiserate with them. For example, after you pitch to a dozen VCs and no one wants to invest, you can talk to your community—they’ve all been through the pain so they understand how you feel. The therapeutic value of the commiseration is really important. You won’t feel so lonely, which, in addition to the hardship of building a company, could be overwhelming.

IH: How can Texas cities become more friendly to founders?

BC: A good ecosystem for startups cannot be developed overnight. It takes several entrepreneur/venture capital cycles—maybe over 20 years.

Someone should have a laser focus on building the tech community so entrepreneurs no longer feel alone in their journey. What entrepreneurs are trying to do is just too overwhelming to do on their own. They will leave for somewhere that has a supportive community if they can’t find the mentorship and network locally. In Austin, most of the time meetings happen by chance. Serendipity is unreliable—someone needs to build a tight knit community and make sure the support network is well-organized.

Someone has to bring capital there. No matter how great the idea is, you need to have money to fund it and make it happen. The number of VC firms and the amount of VC funding in Texas are limited (Note: total VC funding in Austin is $834 million, as compared to $25 billion in Silicon Valley according to the MoneyTree Report from PricewaterhouseCoopers). In Silicon Valley, there are so many funds; a startup can be rejected by a dozen of the top VC firms and still be able to raise funds from hundreds of other VCs. However, in Austin, if you pitch to Austin Ventures and they say no, your fundraising is over.

Also, with a small number of VCs, their time is limited so they can only invest in a small number of companies. Imagine if there are 100 great startups that deserve to be funded but there are only six general partners in your region. Simply for lack of VCs, some of these companies won’t get what they need to survive.

IH: Why is it necessary to raise VC funds locally?

BC: Silicon Valley VCs are unlikely to invest in startups in Texas. VCs have strong motivation to invest in nearby companies because the nature of venture capital investing—95 percent of startups fail—forces them to use their time wisely. VCs usually take board seats at the startups they invest in. Every board seat they take is an opportunity cost, preventing them from taking others. When VCs invest in startups in other cities, they have to travel for board meetings. So the time they spend on that board seat is longer and the opportunity cost for that investment is higher. That’s why you can’t expect Bay Area VCs to invest in Texas startups and when they do, the bar might be three times higher for Texas startups than Bay Area startups.

Funding is not the only value VCs provide for startups; their professional network plays an important role in helping startups succeed as well. However, VCs’ network is geographically dependent. If the startups are far away, they will not be able to benefit from VCs’ powerful network. This lowers their chance of success. This also discourages VCs from investing outside their primary cities.

Raising a fund to start a VC firm in Austin or Houston could be challenging—the new VCs will have to take the extra step to convince potential limited partners that “there is a reason and opportunity to invest here,” instead simply joining all the other VCs are in the Bay Area. However, this is what has to happen. Ideally, the new VCs have built their career and network in Texas for many years, which gives them the motivation and ability to raise a fund locally.

IH: How can Texas cities retain local talent?

BC: It all comes back to the availability of VC funding. Frequently I see announcements that a city is hoping to make the city more attractive to startups with programs for office space or professional services. None of that is a big expense compared to your employee costs. Some people argue that since everything is more expensive in the Bay Area, it makes sense to stay in Austin or Houston. For example, with $1 million funding, you might be able to hire 10 employees in Houston, but in the Bay Area, you can only hire 5 employees with similar credentials. However, this is an unrealistic comparison. In Houston, you are more likely to get $0 funding so really you can’t hire anyone while in the Bay Area, you might be able to get $1 million and hire 5 employees.

Each entrepreneur has their own timeline—when they need to raise funding, if there’s no funding available in Austin or Houston, they either have to shut down their startups or move to the Bay Area and raise money here. Right now everyone just follows the gravity and moves to the Bay Area because that’s the easiest. Texas is losing the tech talents and startups that create so many jobs to the Bay Area. It is very important to break the cycle. Step one is to stop the talent drain with VC funding and keep startups here. As the ecosystem matures, the long-term goal is to make it as easy to raise funding in major Texas cities as in the Bay Area.

Categories
McNair Center Weekly Roundup

Entrepreneurship Weekly Roundup: 2/24/17

Weekly Roundup is a McNair Center series compiling and summarizing the week’s most important Entrepreneurship and Innovation news.

Here is what you need to know about entrepreneurship this week:

Austin’s Venture Capital

Eliza Martin, Research Assistant, McNair Center for Entrepreneurship and Innovation

In her latest post for the McNair Center, Martin follows up on her previous analysis of Austin’s booming entrepreneurial ecosystem. Martin highlights Austin’s decreases in VC investment and deal closures from 2016 as signs of a slowing in growth. According to a report released by PitchBook, 2016 brought substantially fewer deal closures than 2015 for Austin startups. Martin suggests that increased perceived risk among investors and a recent decline in startups are byproducts of an over-investment into Austin startups in previous years.

Still, Martin remains optimistic about the health of Austin’s entrepreneurial ecosystem going forward, predicting that the city “ will see investment increase again after VC investment balances out.”

Big Food Looks to Startups for Ideas, Innovation

Annie Gasparro, Reporter, Wall Street Journal

When the Kellogg’s and General Mill’s of the food industry realized that they couldn’t quell rising consumer obsession with healthy and unprocessed products, they started investing in food startups.

In recent years, many prominent names in the food processing and consumer goods industry began creating VC funds to invest food startups. According to CircleUp, a company that acts as an investment marketplace for food startups and PE firms, big players in the consumer good industry saw roughly $18 billion of their market share swept away by smaller competitors between 2011 and 2015. These partnerships are also mutually beneficial. Emerging food startups gain access to resources and credibility, and larger corporations receive valuable insight into the successful marketing strategies and recipes of their new competitors.

Why Some Startups Succeed (and Why Most Fail)

Patrick Henry, Founder and CEO of QuestFusion, Contributor, Entrepreneur

In his article for the Entrepreneur, successful entrepreneur and startup consultant, Patrick Henry, analyzes startup failures and successes. Henry reinforces the relevance of his post by citing an article by FastCompany, which states that 75% of venture-backed startups fail. Henry frames the question in two ways: what makes startups fail, and what makes startups succeed? Citing studies from StatisticBrain, CB Insights and Compass,

Henry attributes most business outcomes to company leadership. More often than not, successful startups have CEO’s or c-suite members with general and industry-specific business knowledge. Think Google’s Eric Schmidt, Ebay’s Meg Whitman or Apple’s Steve Jobs. Commons reasons for startup failures, such as raising too much capital too quickly, running out of cash or ineffective marketing, signal poor decision-making at the management level. Company founders should consider adding “seasoned” business veterans who the possess “domain expertise” to best support their strong technical team and existing product design.

According to Henry, startups should not undergo more than two pivots. Pivots are changes “in course of direction that result in a material change in the product-market strategy.” While young businesses should be equipped to adjust to market fluctuations, they should avoid being so flexible that they lose sight of their founding mission.

The Megatrends of Entrepreneurship are Key to Job Growth

Wendy Guillies, Contributor, Forbes

Wendy Guillies, President and CEO of the Kauffman Foundation, discusses the megatrends of entrepreneurship.

The first major trend involves demographics. Despite America’s growing diversity, the country’s entrepreneurial population has remained largely stagnant. Women and other minorities remain largely underrepresented in business ownership. According to Kauffman Foundation data, minorities and women are half as likely as their counterparts to own a business that employs people.

The second key trend focuses on geography. Entrepreneurial activity is becoming increasingly concentrated in urban centers. According to Guillies, this phenomenon is largely a function of population shifts, as more and more people relocate to cities. From the 1980s to 2017, the share of small businesses based in rural communities dropped from 20 to 12 percent. “Increasing urbanism” also has spurred the spread of entrepreneurial activity from the major coastal hubs, “ driving geographical equality.”

The third trend involves job creation and technology. According to Guillies, “in the past, as companies scaled their revenue, jobs scaled in an almost linear fashion.” Now, this is no longer the case. For example, in 1962, when Kodak reached $1 billion ($8 billion today) in sales, the corporation employed over 75,000 people. When Facebook surpassed similar sales targets in 2012, the company employed a mere 6,300 workers. Despite promoting capital efficiency, digitization has slowed job creation from the startup sector, However, there is a significant upside to these web-based technologies: such platforms lower many of the barriers to market entry for small businesses.

According to Guillies, “these three megatrend…are sources of both concern and optimism.” If entrepreneurs and policymakers can better understand and take advantages of these trends, they can “enhance job opportunities for the benefit of us all.” For instance, if minorities alone started as many businesses as non-minorities, the economy would add more than 9.5 million jobs.

QA with Jared Bakewell on the 2017 Annual State of Entrepreneurship Address

Silicon Prairie Team, Silicon Prairie News

The 8th Annual State of Entrepreneurship Address took place this past weekend in Washington D.C. Jared Bakewell, CEO and Co-founder of Proseeds, an Omaha-based startup, recently sat down with the Silicon Prairie Team to discuss the event’s key takeaways. The Kauffman Foundation’s Guillies delivered the address,and she focused on the three major trends of entrepreneurship.

In the interview, Bakewell stressed a general consensus among the event’s attendees, which included entrepreneurs, venture capitalists, and politicians: government policy should remove early barriers to success for startups and small businesses. For entrepreneurs in the midwest and rural areas, access to capital is a concern.Currently, most of the nation’s VC flows toward the coastal hubs. Additional concerns for startups looking to expand operations are instabilities in both healthcare and immigration policy. Bakewell optimistically concluded the interview, adding that many of the attending politicians appeared open to the suggested solutions to these challenges.

IBM Watson joins Indiegogo to back a crowdfund-to-production service for entrepreneurs

Khari Johnson, Reporter, VentureBeat

Last week, IBM Watson and Arrow Electronics announced a new partnership with crowdfunding website, Indiegogo. IBM spokesman Deon Newman shared with VentureBeat that the partnership will expand Indiegogo’s operations from purely fundraising to also incubating and accelerating startups.

Indiegogo cofounder Slava Rubin reiterated the strategic shift, telling VentureBeat that the company plans on evolving its platform into “a springboard for entrepreneurs.” All startups that participate in the partnership’s services will gain access to IBM Watson’s Bluemix. Bluemix, along with IBM Watson’s other AI services, will offer smaller companies the opportunity to apply machine learning processes to their existing infrastructure. Some successful participants will even participate in Bluexmix’s global entrepreneur program and receive $50,000 in capital from Arrow.

Categories
McNair Center Startup Ecosystems

Austin’s Venture Capital

Austin, Texas
Austin, Texas

In my previous blog post, I discussed Austin, Texas’ strong history of entrepreneurship and the many resources in the ecosystem. Supportive Austin policies have resulted in the creation of the Entrepreneur Center of Austin, and resources like Capital Factory and Tech Ranch Austin have emerged. Austin’s entrepreneurial ecosystem appeared to be healthy.

A recent PitchBook Report discussing venture capital in Austin shows the ecosystem to not be as healthy as previously thought. In 2014, Austin saw 286 deals closed at a value of $1.4 billion. Similarly, in 2015, 296 deals closed or $1.3 billion. 2016 saw a substantial decrease in the number and value of deals closed with 199 deals closed at a value of $978 million.

Austin’s ecosystem reflects a nationwide trend in declining deals. According to PitchBook, the number of deals closed nationwide had been rising steadily since 2009, peaking in 2014 with 10,501 deals closed. 2015 and 2016 both saw decreases in the number of deals closed; 10,293 and 8,136 respectively. The 8,136 deals closed in 2016 is the lowest number of deals closed since 2012.

An insufficient supply of startups and an increased perception of risk are decreasing VC investment in the Austin ecosystem. Investors likely fear that the oversupply of capital that has been invested in the system in 2014 and 2015 has led to slumping returns, so they are pulling back their investments. Once VC investment balances out, it is likely that Austin will see investment increase again.

Outside investment in Austin-based companies soared in 2014 and 2015, as respectively, 396 and 370 investors from outside the Austin metropolitan statistical area invested in Austin-based ventures. In 2015, Austin had the most venture capital invested in its first financings with $324 million. However, venture capital activity in the United States overall has declined. Austin’s most prominent VC fund, Austin Ventures, closed in 2015. After the two-year boom period from 2014 to 2015, the rate of VC investing in Austin startups has slid considerably over the 2016 period.

Austin’s diverse ecosystem is an asset to the stability of VC investment in the area. While the majority of VC activity occurs in the software industry, the pharmaceutical and biotech industry also attract significant VC investment. In 2015, 12 deals were closed in health care devices and services, and in 2016, 11 deals. The opening of the Dell Seton Medical Center and Capital City Innovation, which will work to connect entrepreneurs with healthcare research, will likely contribute to increases in VC for health care devices and services.

According to a McNair Center Report, VC investment in Texas is falling. Yet Austin’s relatively low costs and the boom of angel/seed investment have given Austin a reputation as a thriving startup ecosystem in a state where VC investment is dropping. Despite decreases in a 2016 VC investment in the region, it is likely that Austin will see investment in crease again after VC investment balances out.

Categories
McNair Center Weekly Roundup

Entrepreneurship Weekly Roundup: 12/02/2016

Weekly Roundup is a McNair Center series compiling and summarizing the week’s most important Entrepreneurship and Innovation news.

Here is what you need to know about entrepreneurship this week:

Keep Austin Entrepreneurial

Eliza Martin, Research Assistant, McNair Center for Entrepreneurship and Innovation

In 2016, Austin was ranked as the number one U.S. city for startup activity by the Kauffman Foundation. Austin’s entrepreneurial ecosystem began in the 1970s and 1980s, and was originally focused on computer and semiconductor manufacturing.

Austin’s “Silicon Hills” has diversified into “more than the computer chip and semiconductor industry that first enabled its growth.” The annual South by Southwest Festival draws thousands of tech startups to the city and provides excellent networking opportunities for entrepreneurs. The University of Texas at Austin adds thousands of skilled employees to the city’s labor force each year. Additionally, UT Austin’s boasts the Austin Technology Incubator, a startup-focused incubator run by the university’s IC2 Institute.

Austin provides entrepreneurs with supportive policy infrastructure, skilled and energetic laborers and access to valuable mentorship opportunities. If efforts to grow Austin’s economy continue on their current path, the city will be well poised to solidify its presence as a thriving entrepreneurial ecosystem.

Overtime Rules in Limbo: What Businesses Should Do Now

Jeremy Quittner, Reporter, Fortune

Last week, a federal judge judge in Texas granted a preliminary injunction against the Department of Labor’s new overtime rules that were set to go into effect on December 1st. The new overtime rules would have increased the threshold salary for overtime workers to $47,476 from $23,600. Many small business owners, acting in preparation for the new rule, made the difficult financial decision to switch salaried workers to hourly status.

The preliminary injunction still must go through an additional 60 day period of court hearings before it becomes an official injunction. Additionally, the Obama administration’s Department of Labor could still appeal the judge’s decision to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th circuit. It is not yet clear if the administration will challenge the judge’s decision. Even if the decision is appealed, success on appeal is doubtful; in the court’s recent history, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit has tended to challenge the Obama administration.

McNair Center’s Catherine Kirby previously examined the effects of new overtime labor laws on small businesses in her blog post Small Business and Overtime Regulation.

One simple way billionaire investor Peter Thiel identifies game-changing startups

Eugene Kim, Reporter, Business Insider

Peter Thiel, serial VC investor and founder of PayPal, is known for his profitable investments in successful billion dollar startups, such as Facebook, Palantir, Stripe and SoFi. Business Insider’s Kim reports possible insights into Thiel’s keen eye for return on investment.

In an interview at VC firm Khosla Ventures’ KV CEO Summit, Thiel recently said, “I think in some ways the really good companies often couldn’t even be articulated…we didn’t quite have the right words. Or maybe they were articulated but were articulated in terms of categories that were actually misleading.” Thiel cautioned investors away from startups that rely on buzzwords, such as big data or cloud computing, in their pitches. Thiel said, “…when you hear those words, you need to think fraud and run away as fast as you can. It’s like a tell that you’re bluffing, that there’s nothing unique about the business.”

White House expands platforms for inclusive entrepreneurship

Kate Conger, Reporter, TechCrunch

The White House recently announced “new and expanded plans to improve diversity and inclusion within the startup economy.” The plans are focused on promoting diversity in higher education, investment and entrepreneurship. The initiatives reflect the Obama Administration’s commitment to improving minority representation in universities, investment firms and tech companies. By focusing the initiatives within the private sector, these efforts will hopefully continue after his departure from office.

More than 200 universities, all members of The American Society for Engineering Education, have signed a pledge to promote diversity in their engineering programs. Additionally, more than 30 VC firms and accelerators signed a pledge to diversify access to seed and early stage capital for underrepresented entrepreneurs and reveal information regarding their portfolios’ diversity. Furthermore, 46 tech companies, including Xerox, have joined the Tech Inclusion Pledge, demonstrating a commitment to publicly publish recruitment goals and diversity metrics.

Tom Kalil, deputy director for technology and innovation at the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy, reportedly told TechCrunch there is existing data that indicates diverse firms are more diverse are more likely to be successful. According to Kalil, “A lot of innovation comes from diversity, people with different backgrounds.”

Data science startup Civis Analytics raises $22 million

Ken Yeung, Contributor, VentureBeat

Civis Analytics recently announced that it bagged $22 million in its latest Series A funding round. Civis Analytics was born out of President Obama’s 2012 reelection campaign. Though originally focused on political campaigns, the data science company’s cloud-based platform provides data analytics tools and methodologies  to organizations focused in areas such as health care, media and education. Since its inception, the startup has relied on revenues, rather than funding, to support its operations. However, the startup announced its recent funding will go toward hiring more engineers and data scientists.

Civis Analytics CEO, Dan Wagner states the importance of data analysis to business success: “Everyone knows that they need to be using data, but most don’t know where to start. Or, if they are using data, they aren’t necessarily asking and answering the right questions.”

Stripe Investment Makes Cofounder The World’s Youngest Self-Made Billionaire

Ryan Mac, Reporter, Forbes

Brothers Patrick and John Collison are cofounders of San Francisco-based startup Stripe. Stripe is a tech company that enables private individuals and companies to engage in transactions via the internet and on mobile apps. MIT and Harvard dropouts, respectively, Patrick and John Collison recently joined the ranks of the world’s youngest self-made billionaires. Stripe recently announced a successful funding round, which doubled the startup’s valuation to $9.2 billion. CapitalG and General Catalyst Partners jointly invested $150 million in Stripe during its latest funding round.

Despite their early success, the Collision brothers are still hungry for more; Patrick Collison told Forbes in January of 2014 that, “Heartening as the success to date has been, we are so early in accomplishing the goals that we set out for ourselves. If anyone here believes that Stripe has already made it, that would be hugely problematic for us.”

QA with Kauffman’s Victor Hwang on entrepreneurship in the heartland

Ryan Pendell, Contributor, Silicon Prairie News

Victor Hwang, Vice President of Kauffman Foundation, and Phil Wickham, Executive Chairman of Kauffman Fellows set out on a road trip through America’s Midwest earlier this month to “take the pulse of entrepreneurship in America’s “middle.” Despite a nationwide political narrative that depicts the Midwest in a state of slumping stagnation, caught between booming coastal economies, Hwang and Wickham report that Midwestern entrepreneurs are actively seeking out business solutions to improve the quality of life within their communities. Since the benefits of the tech boom have been focused on the coasts, Hwang and Wickham cite the biggest challenges to Midwestern entrepreneurs as access to capital.

According to Hwang, the need to build infrastructure and capital should be considered both a challenge and an opportunity for Midwestern entrepreneurs going forward. Hwang expressed optimism for the future of the Midwestern economy, claiming that the region’s culture of “civic mindedness, that willingness to pitch in, that willingness to take risks and help others reach their ambitions” is still alive.

Policy Changes Needed to Unlock Employment and Entrepreneurial Opportunity for 100 Million Americans with Criminal Records, Kauffman Research Shows

Ewing Marion Kauffman Foundation

According to a report recently published by the Kauffman Foundation, rethinking America’s “occupational licensing policy could counter recidivism, encourage entrepreneurship and boost the American economy.” Currently, occupational licensing requirements prevent individuals with a criminal history from securing licenses that could open the door to financial stability and self-sufficiency. Many occupations that require occupational licenses are on low-skilled and high-skilled professions; increased labor participation, productivity and entrepreneurship by released inmates within these fields could therefore produce benefits for the overall economy. According to the Kauffman Foundation’s study, over 60 percent of inmates released each year from state or federal prison are still unemployed after one year of their release.

The Kauffman Foundation’s Emily Fetsch notes that the high levels of recidivism and unemployment among ex-convicts indicate a fundamental issue with the country’s occupational licensing policy: “Hundreds of professions that require occupational licenses could provide paths to economic independence for those formerly incarcerated, except for the fact that their criminal histories alone may ban them from receiving licenses, even if their convictions had no relevancy to the job.”

Fetsch recommends reforms to occupational licensing policy that would exclude only criminal defendants who pose a a public threat or when convictions are recent and relevant to the context of an occupation. Additionally, Fetsch proposes offering the formerly incarcerated opportunities to earn rehabilitation or restoration certificates, thereby preventing inmates from automatic disqualification for consideration of occupational licenses solely on the basis of their arrest. Lastly, Fetsch contemplates disposing of occupational licensing requirements altogether, expressing skepticism for the regulation’s effects in promoting public safety and health.

An Incubator for (Former) Drug Dealers

Maura Ewing, Reporter, Bloomberg

“Amid calls for more job training, less automatic background searching and other changes that would make it easier for ex-felons to become employees” Bloomberg’s Ewing reports on an alternative perspective solution on the fight to curb recidivism and unemployment  among the formerly incarcerated: encouraging them to start their own businesses.

The public and private sphere should continue to push programs that support formerly incarcerated individuals, as well as tackle the structural problems that face these prisoners as they re-enter society. However, Ewing asserts that more emphasis should be placed on the potential returns on fostering entrepreneurship among this commonly dismissed population.

Defy Ventures, a nonprofit incubator based in New York, certainly achieved success in this regard by transforming ex-convicts into entrepreneurs. Over the past six years, Defy Ventures has trained upwards of 500 released felons and successfully incubated over 150 companies. What’s more, the recidivism rate among the incubator’s alumni within five years post release is an astonishing 3 percent, compared to the national average of 76 percent. Defy Venture’s efficacy in curbing recidivism rates suggests that future initiatives to support released prisoners should be focused on entrepreneurship.

Ewing’s article tells the story of another incubator underway in Hartford. The incubator, TRAP House, focuses on supporting former drug dealers as they start new, legal companies. The incubator’s name makes a clever reference to slang for drug-stash locations and is “short for transforming, reinvesting and prospering.”

Happy Holidays from the McNair Center for Entrepreneurship and Innovation. The Entrepreneurship Weekly Roundup will return in January.

Categories
McNair Center Startup Ecosystems

Keep Austin Entrepreneurial

Austin, Texas

Ranked number one for startup activity in the last two years by the Kauffman Foundation, Austin, Texas is one of the strongest emerging entrepreneurship ecosystems in the United States. Austin’s history of entrepreneurship and supportive government has facilitated Austin’s emergence as an entrepreneurial ecosystem.

Austin’s History of Entrepreneurship

During the 1970s and 1980s, Austin’s entrepreneurial ecosystem focused on computer and semiconductor manufacturing. Efforts by the Austin Chamber of Commerce, such as low mortgage rates for relocating staff and tax incentives, fueled the move of several major companies to Austin: IBM in 1967, Texas Instruments in 1969 and Motorola in 1974. A doubling in student attendance at the University of Texas in the early 1970s increased the educated workforce in the region.

The selection of Austin as the home of the Microelectronic Computer Corporation (MCC) in 1982 accelerated this concentration of high-tech companies. Facing fierce competition from Japan’s Fifth Generation Project, major U.S. companies banded together and created MCC, one of the largest computer research companies at the time. MCC chose Austin instead of Silicon Valley and Route 128 because the University of Texas offered MCC a subsidized lease and the Chamber of Commerce facilitated low-cost loans and reduced mortgage rates for staff moving to Austin.

Austin, Texas
Austin, Texas

Initially, the Austin ecosystem was primarily large businesses, such as IBM and Texas Instruments. This focus changed after the oil slump and savings and loan crises of the late 1980s and early 1990s crippled the Texas economy. Austin was not spared. It had one of the highest commercial real estate vacancy rates in the country and companies laid off large numbers of employees.

In response, the University of Texas formed the Austin Technology Incubator (ATI) in 1989 to jumpstart the local economy through high-tech startups with high-growth potential. In 1989, Greg Kozmetsky, the brain behind ATI, founded Austin’s first angel network, the Capital Network. These initiatives provided a foundation for growth during the 1990s dot-com boom. Austin companies such as Garden.com, an online gardening shop that raised $50 million in venture capital, and DrKoop.com, an “Internet-based consumer health-care network,” that was worth more than $1 billion, found success in Austin.

In 2000, thirty Austin venture capitalists invested over $2 billion in entrepreneurship ventures. The subsequent burst of the dot-com bubble in the early 2000s hurt Austin. After the 2001-2003 economic downturn, the region experienced major industrial restructuring and a renewal of entrepreneurship.

In 2003, the business community raised $11 million for Opportunity Austin, an economic development program. Opportunity Austin focused on recruiting new businesses, marketing Austin effectively and stimulating entrepreneurship and emerging technology sectors.

Less than five years after the last economic downturn, the Great Recession of 2008 set back many new Austin businesses. While venture capital and small business creation are not at the level they were during the dot-com boom, the rate of startup growth is currently 81.23 percent.

Entrepreneurship in Austin Now

Austin is experiencing yet another entrepreneurship boom. Austin now has the supportive policy structure, mentors and sector diversification required to finally establish a lasting ecosystem.

Austin’s cultural support of local businesses and responsive state and local government policies are fueling its start-up growth. The absence of state income tax incentivizes young professionals to work and settle in Texas. The local Austin government provides services for people considering starting a business such as BizAid Business Orientation and Small Business Program. The Entrepreneur Center of Austin and the Indus Entrepreneurs of Austin specifically provide support for start-ups. The University of Texas’ Herb Kelleher Center for Entrepreneurship, Growth and Renewal connects Austin entrepreneurs with resources.

As a result of Austin’s strong history of entrepreneurship, mentorship opportunities for nascent entrepreneurs are readily available. Austin companies, such as Dell, offer mentorship and accelerator programs. Entrepreneurial hubs, such as Tech Ranch Austin and Capital Factory, serve as an intersection between Austin incubators, accelerators, coworking spaces and also offer mentorship programs for entrepreneurs.

While known as “Silicon Hills,” Austin’s entrepreneurship economy is much more diversified than the computer chip and semiconductor industry that first enabled its growth. According to a 2015 Austin Technology Council report, approximately 14 percent of the $22.3 billion value of Austin’s tech companies came from semiconductors. Computer and peripheral equipment contributed 31 percent. Both Austin-born and transplanted companies focus on the bioscience, energy, clean-technology, water and IT/wireless industries. Austin has an extremely strong tech-focused entrepreneurship industry, but it also has successful media, education and social and craft/lifestyle ventures.

Venture Capital in Texas and Austin

Texas’ venture capital investment has decreased by 19 percent over the past ten years. To maintain a healthy entrepreneurship ecosystem, it is imperative that venture capital investment increases in the coming years.

Austin’s ecosystem lacks capital. In 2014, Austin saw 99 venture capital deals worth $739 million. In contrast, Silicon Valley saw 1,333 deals worth more than $27 billion. While there is no shortage of capital in Texas, there is a lack of capital access, information and government support. The majority of Texas capital is invested in oil, gas and real estate. These are considered by many to be less risky than entrepreneurship ventures. However, as oil prices fall, Texans should consider trying to raise growth and investing in entrepreneurial ventures.

Austin’s most prominent venture capital fund, Austin Ventures, closed in 2015. Phil Siegel and David Lack left to form Tritium Partners to provide capital for startups in Austin. Its first fund of $309 million is a fraction of the $900 million Austin Ventures raised at its peak. Silverton Partners and S3 Ventures have tried to fill the void left by Austin Ventures. However, none of these Austin venture capital funds have the capital or assets that Austin Ventures had.

Entrepreneurial Resources in Austin

Austin has a plethora of resources for entrepreneurs. The annual South by Southwest Festival provides networking opportunities. Companies are taking advantage of the 100,000 college students that graduate each year in the greater Austin area. The University of Texas at Austin boasts the Austin Technology Incubator under the IC² Institute, which has raised almost $700 million in investor capital to achieve this goal. Additionally, the Central Texas Angel Network provides capital and mentorship support for entrepreneurs in the Central Texas region.

What Starts in Austin, Changes the World

Austin’s entrepreneurial ecosystem is moving towards national recognition. Favor, a food delivery app, is an alumni of ATI and backed by Austin’s S3 Ventures and Silverton Partners. HomeAway, an Austin based online rental marketplace, was established in 2005 and acquired by Expedia for $3.9 billion in 2015. In the upcoming years, it is critical that capital investment continues to support new ventures such as Favor and HomeAway. Austin’s ecosystem has the policy, talent and mentorship to be successful, but private and public efforts must continue to ensure its success.