Changes

The Eastern District of Texas began to rise in prominence due to the patent monetization strategy that Texas Instruments used in the 1980s to save itself from bankruptcy. [http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2012-01-13/kodak-mines-patents-for-cash-copying-texas-instruments (Bloomberg)] By the 1990s, Texas Instruments was earning more money from patent litigation than it was earning from operations. To maintain its profits, Texas Instruments had to continue using the court to extract royalties from those using their patents without permission. However, criminal cases had begun impeding speedy trials in Dallas, where Texas Instruments was is based, so it looked toward Marshall, where criminal cases only made up only 10 percent of the docket. [http://www.texasmonthly.com/politics/patently-unfair/ (Texas Monthly)] Judge T. John Ward began hearing patent cases after he was sworn in on the East Texas federal bench and developed a set of rules for the court that counteracted the traditionally slow pace of patent cases. These changes, including page limits on document and strictly timed opening and closing documents, earned Marshall the reputation of being a "rocket docket." Consequently, the Eastern District of Texas was soon inundated with patent suits filed by companies who wanted to resolve their conflicts quickly. [http://www.nytimes.com/2006/09/24/business/24ward.html?_ (NYT)]