Difference between revisions of "Can Small Firms Mitigate their Disadvantages in Patent Litigation?"

From edegan.com
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 18: Line 18:
  
 
==Data Issues==
 
==Data Issues==
===Citations Table===
 
The table has two columns, 'citingpatentnumber' and 'citedpatentnumber'. There are rows with 'citedpatentnumber' greater than 10000000. For instance:
 
  
  citingpatentnumber | citedpatentnumber
 
--------------------+-------------------
 
            9226901 |      102005013726
 
            9226905 |        101332187
 
            9226905 |        2006528175
 
            9226905 |        2011513304
 
            9226905 |    1020090061010
 
            9226905 |    1020110049808
 
            9226905 |        2010126349
 
            9226909 |        101340916
 
            9226909 |          10128910
 
            9226914 |        102318827
 
            9226914 |        2014109862
 
            9226915 |          10111049
 
            9226918 |        2008005345
 
            9226918 |        2008005345
 
            9226918 |        2008077092
 
            9226918 |        2008077092
 
            9226918 |        2008070268
 
            9226918 |        2008128126
 
            9226921 |        2008129994
 
            9226922 |        2012000595
 
            9226922 |        2012058127
 
            9226923 |        2010135524
 
            9226930 |        102002040
 
            9226930 |          19507522
 
            9226930 |          50106981
 
            9226930 |          53082783
 
            9226930 |          57052334
 
            9226930 |          10029979
 
            9226930 |          10045750
 
            9226931 |        2008203212
 
            9226931 |        2010227111
 
            9226931 |        2012068515
 
            9226931 |        2013106565
 
            9226932 |        103458880
 
            9226933 |        2006257751
 
            9226933 |        101366734
 
            9226933 |        101396048
 
            9226933 |        101926831
 
            9226933 |          20202562
 
            9226933 |      202005009120
 
            9226933 |          61063618
 
            9226937 |          11510473
 
            9226937 |        2001506579
 
            9226937 |        2001519791
 
            9226937 |        2003119127
 
            9226937 |        2003517831
 
            9226937 |        2005099761
 
            9226937 |        2006076681
 
            9226937 |        2006078941
 
            9226937 |        2006079021
 
            9226937 |        2006094209
 
            9226937 |        2006094210
 
            9226937 |        2006094233
 
            9226937 |        2006094235
 
 
 
allpatent_clone=# SELECT  COUNT(*) FROM citations WHERE citedpatentnumber>10000000;
 
  count 
 
---------
 
1411140
 
(1 row)
 
 
 
  allpatent_clone=# SELECT  COUNT(*) FROM citations WHERE citedpatentnumber IS NULL;
 
  count 
 
----------
 
  23516667
 
(1 row)
 
 
allpatent_clone=# SELECT  COUNT(*) FROM citations;
 
  count 
 
----------
 
  97680838
 
(1 row)
 
 
====Possible Solution====
 
Jul 8, 2016: The blank citedpatentnumbers were created due to inconsistency between the original type and the type in the citation table (string to integer). The blank entries mostly correspond to publication number, non-U.S. patent number, and non-standardized patent number. The next step would be to recreate the table accounting for these issues.  The U.S. publication number could be matched to the publications numbers in the histpatent table and be replaced by the corresponding patent numbers.
 
 
The foreign cited patents will be moved to a separate table.
 
 
===Assignees Table===
 
'Country' is missing.
 
 
allpatent_clone=# SELECT COUNT(*) FROM assignees WHERE country=' ';
 
  count 
 
---------
 
2361543
 
(1 row)
 
 
 
allpatent_clone=# SELECT COUNT(*) FROM assignees WHERE country='unknown';
 
count
 
-------
 
  3918
 
(1 row)
 
 
allpatent_clone=# SELECT COUNT(*) FROM assignees WHERE country IN ('unknown',' ') AND state=' ';
 
  count 
 
---------
 
1851353
 
(1 row)
 
 
 
UPDATE: The source of the problem seems to be the Harvard Dataverse.
 
 
===Assignees & assigneesUSU Tables===
 
 
No information provided about the assignee. No entries for orgname or first and last names.
 
 
allpatent_clone=# SELECT COUNT(patentnumber) FROM assignees WHERE (orgname='' OR orgname IS NULL) AND (firstname='' OR firstname IS NULL) AND (lastname='' OR lastname IS NULL);
 
count 
 
--------
 
344794
 
(1 row)
 
 
AssigneesUSU table was made with the following code:
 
 
SELECT orgname, patentnumber, country, firstname, lastname, state
 
INTO assigneesUSU -- assignees in US,unknown, and blank entries
 
FROM assignees
 
WHERE country IN ('US', '', 'unknown') OR (state IS NOT NULL AND state!='')
 
ORDER BY orgname;
 
 
allpatent_clone=# SELECT COUNT(patentnumber) FROM assigneesUSU WHERE (orgname='' OR orgname IS NULL) AND (firstname='' OR firstname IS NULL) AND (lastname='' OR lastname IS NULL); 
 
count 
 
--------
 
344793
 
(1 row)
 
  
 
==References==
 
==References==

Revision as of 12:24, 12 July 2016

Return to Patent Data Wiki Page.


McNair Project
Can Small Firms Mitigate their Disadvantages in Patent Litigation?
Project logo 02.png
Project Information
Project Title
Start Date
Deadline
Primary Billing
Notes
Has project status
Copyright © 2016 edegan.com. All Rights Reserved.


Abstract

The Little Guy Academic Paper will focus on the disproportionate patent litigation of small firms. The paper will also explore the disadvantages small firms may face in patent litigation. By using the patent data provided by the USPTO and Harvard Dataverse, micro and small entities will be identified based on maintenance fees paid to the USPTO. Patent portfolios of all firms contained in both datasets will be constructed. By making the distinction between micro, small, and large, comparisons will be draw between frequency and outcomes of litigation. Data on patent litigation will be acquired through the Lex Machina database.

Data Issues

References