Difference between revisions of "Tullock (1967) - The Welfare Costs Of Monopolies Tariffs And Theft"

From edegan.com
Jump to navigation Jump to search
 
Line 1: Line 1:
 
{{Article
 
{{Article
 
|Has page=Tullock (1967) - The Welfare Costs Of Monopolies Tariffs And Theft
 
|Has page=Tullock (1967) - The Welfare Costs Of Monopolies Tariffs And Theft
|Has title=The Welfare Costs Of Monopolies Tariffs And Theft
+
|Has bibtex key=
 +
|Has article title=The Welfare Costs Of Monopolies Tariffs And Theft
 
|Has author=Tullock
 
|Has author=Tullock
 
|Has year=1967
 
|Has year=1967

Latest revision as of 18:15, 29 September 2020

Article
Has bibtex key
Has article title The Welfare Costs Of Monopolies Tariffs And Theft
Has author Tullock
Has year 1967
In journal
In volume
In number
Has pages
Has publisher
© edegan.com, 2016

Reference(s)

Tullock, G. (1967), The Welfare Costs of Monopolies, Tariffs, and Theft, Western Economic Journal 5, 224-32. pdf

Abstract

In recent years a considerable number of studies have been published that purport to measure the welfare costs of monopolies and tariffs. The results have uniformly shown very small costs for practices that economists normally deplore. This led Mundell to comment in 1962 that "Unless there is a thorough theoretical re-examination of the validity of the tools upon which these studies are founded . . . someone will inevitably draw the conclusion that economics has ceased to be important." Judging from conversations with graduate students, a number of younger economists are in fact drawing the conclusion that tariffs and monopolies are not of much importance. This view is now beginning to appear in the literature. On the basis of these measurements Professor Harvey Leibenstein has argued "Microeconomic theory focuses on allocative efKciency to the exclusion of other types of efiiaencies that, in fact, are much more significant in many instances."