Difference between revisions of "Mcdevitt (2010) - Names And Reputations An Empirical Analysis"
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Article | {{Article | ||
|Has page=Mcdevitt (2010) - Names And Reputations An Empirical Analysis | |Has page=Mcdevitt (2010) - Names And Reputations An Empirical Analysis | ||
− | |Has title=Names And Reputations An Empirical Analysis | + | |Has bibtex key= |
+ | |Has article title=Names And Reputations An Empirical Analysis | ||
|Has author=Mcdevitt | |Has author=Mcdevitt | ||
|Has year=2010 | |Has year=2010 |
Latest revision as of 18:15, 29 September 2020
Article | |
---|---|
Has bibtex key | |
Has article title | Names And Reputations An Empirical Analysis |
Has author | Mcdevitt |
Has year | 2010 |
In journal | |
In volume | |
In number | |
Has pages | |
Has publisher | |
© edegan.com, 2016 |
Reference(s)
McDevitt, Ryan (2010), "Names and Reputations: An Empirical Analysis," mimeo, northwestern university pdf
Abstract
This paper tests several predictions of the theoretical literature on firm reputation. A main result in the literature, that poor past performance will prompt a firm to conceal its reputation, is confirmed empirically in the market for residential plumbing services. A firm with a record of complaints one standard deviation above the mean was 133.2% more likely to change its name than the average �firm. In addition, �firms with longer track records were less likely to change their names or exit, while �firms that made more �firm-specific investments, such as advertising, were more likely to change their names than exit. Finally, �firms in small markets were found to value their reputations comparatively more than firms in large markets.