Difference between revisions of "Mcdevitt (2010) - Names And Reputations An Empirical Analysis"

From edegan.com
Jump to navigation Jump to search
 
Line 1: Line 1:
 
{{Article
 
{{Article
 
|Has page=Mcdevitt (2010) - Names And Reputations An Empirical Analysis
 
|Has page=Mcdevitt (2010) - Names And Reputations An Empirical Analysis
|Has title=Names And Reputations An Empirical Analysis
+
|Has bibtex key=
 +
|Has article title=Names And Reputations An Empirical Analysis
 
|Has author=Mcdevitt
 
|Has author=Mcdevitt
 
|Has year=2010
 
|Has year=2010

Latest revision as of 18:15, 29 September 2020

Article
Has bibtex key
Has article title Names And Reputations An Empirical Analysis
Has author Mcdevitt
Has year 2010
In journal
In volume
In number
Has pages
Has publisher
© edegan.com, 2016

Reference(s)

McDevitt, Ryan (2010), "Names and Reputations: An Empirical Analysis," mimeo, northwestern university pdf

Abstract

This paper tests several predictions of the theoretical literature on firm reputation. A main result in the literature, that poor past performance will prompt a firm to conceal its reputation, is confirmed empirically in the market for residential plumbing services. A firm with a record of complaints one standard deviation above the mean was 133.2% more likely to change its name than the average �firm. In addition, �firms with longer track records were less likely to change their names or exit, while �firms that made more �firm-specific investments, such as advertising, were more likely to change their names than exit. Finally, �firms in small markets were found to value their reputations comparatively more than firms in large markets.