Difference between revisions of "Mccubbins Noll Weingast (1987) - Administrative Procedures As Instruments Of Control"

From edegan.com
Jump to navigation Jump to search
 
Line 1: Line 1:
 
{{Article
 
{{Article
 
|Has page=Mccubbins Noll Weingast (1987) - Administrative Procedures As Instruments Of Control
 
|Has page=Mccubbins Noll Weingast (1987) - Administrative Procedures As Instruments Of Control
|Has title=Administrative Procedures As Instruments Of Control
+
|Has bibtex key=
 +
|Has article title=Administrative Procedures As Instruments Of Control
 
|Has author=Mccubbins Noll Weingast
 
|Has author=Mccubbins Noll Weingast
 
|Has year=1987
 
|Has year=1987

Latest revision as of 18:15, 29 September 2020

Article
Has bibtex key
Has article title Administrative Procedures As Instruments Of Control
Has author Mccubbins Noll Weingast
Has year 1987
In journal
In volume
In number
Has pages
Has publisher
© edegan.com, 2016

Reference(s)

McCubbins, Matt, Roger Noll and Barry Weingast (1987), "Administrative Procedures as Instruments of Control", JLEO, pp. 243-277. pdf

Abstract

A central problem of representative democracy is how to ensure that policy decisions are responsive to the interests or preferences of citizens. The U.S. Constitution deals with the electoral side of this problem by constructing institutional safeguards and incentive structures designed to make elected representatives responsive to citizens. But making policy involves more than decisions by elected legislators and the president. lnevitably, elected officials delegate considerable policy making authority to unelected bureaucrats. Because elected officials have limited resources for monitoring agency's performance, the possibility arises that bureaucrats will not comply with their policy preferences. This gives rise to the question how -or, in deed, whether -elected political officials can reasonably effectively assure that their policy intentions will be carried out. This paper explores the principles of the political control of bureaucratic decisions. In so doing, we seek to develolp a unifying conceptual frLamework for two general types of coIntrols: "oversight" - monitoring, rewarding, and punishing bureaucratic behavior - and adminisitrative proceedures.