Difference between revisions of "Coate Morris (1995) - On The Form Of Transfers To Special Interests"

From edegan.com
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 2: Line 2:
 
|Has page=Coate Morris (1995) - On The Form Of Transfers To Special Interests
 
|Has page=Coate Morris (1995) - On The Form Of Transfers To Special Interests
 
|Has title=On The Form Of Transfers To Special Interests
 
|Has title=On The Form Of Transfers To Special Interests
|Has author=
+
|Has author=Coate Morris
 
|Has year=1995
 
|Has year=1995
 
|In journal=
 
|In journal=

Revision as of 12:22, 29 September 2020

Article
Has bibtex key
Has article title
Has author Coate Morris
Has year 1995
In journal
In volume
In number
Has pages
Has publisher
© edegan.com, 2016

Reference(s)

Coate, S. and S. Morris (1995), On the Form of Transfers to Special Interests, Journal of Political Economy 103(6), 1210-35. pdf

Abstract

An important question in political economy concerns the form of transfers to special interests. The Chicago view is that political competition leads politicians to make such transfers efficiently. The Virginia position is that lack of information on the part of voters leads politicians to favor inefficient "sneaky" methods of redistribution. This paper analyzes the form of transfers in a model of political competition in which politicians have incentives to make transfers to special interests. It shows that when voters have imperfect information about both the effects of policy and the predispositions of politicians, inefficient methods of redistribution may be employed.

Summary and Model

Fully rational citizens are uncertain about (a) How necessary a policy is, and (b) whether a politician is "good" for public welfare or "bad" (ie, help special interests only).

Good politicians want only what is best for society. Bad politicians want to transfer to special interests. They can do so by either funding unnecessary projects or through direct transfers. Choice of project and transfer is observable.

Main result: Politicians may prefere inefficient transfers to special interests because they conceal the politician's type.