Difference between revisions of "Hall (2005) - A Note On The Bias In Herfindahl Type Measures Based On Count Data"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
|Has title=A Note On The Bias In Herfindahl Type Measures Based On Count Data | |Has title=A Note On The Bias In Herfindahl Type Measures Based On Count Data | ||
|Has author= | |Has author= | ||
| − | |Has year= | + | |Has year=2005 |
|In journal= | |In journal= | ||
|In volume= | |In volume= | ||
Revision as of 12:19, 29 September 2020
| Article | |
|---|---|
| Has bibtex key | |
| Has article title | |
| Has year | 2005 |
| In journal | |
| In volume | |
| In number | |
| Has pages | |
| Has publisher | |
| © edegan.com, 2016 | |
- This page is referenced in the Patent Thicket Literature Review
- This page is listed on the PTLR Core Papers page
Reference
- Hall, B.H. (2005), "A note on the bias in Herfindahl-type measures based on count data", Revue D' Economie Industrielle, Paris Editions, Techniques Et Economiques, Vol.110, pp.149
@article{hall2005note,
title={A note on the bias in Herfindahl-type measures based on count data},
author={Hall, B.H.},
journal={Revue D' Economie Industrielle, Paris Editions, Techniques Et Economiques},
volume={110},
pages={149},
year={2005},
abstract={A Herfindahl index of constructed from shares based on count data where the number of counts is small will generally be biased downward because of the statistical properties of count data and Jensens inequality. This note suggests a simple correction for the bias and illustrates its applicability when using measures based on patent data and patent citation data.},
discipline={Econ},
research_type={Measures},
industry={},
thicket_stance={},
thicket_stance_extract={},
thicket_def={},
thicket_def_extract={},
tags={},
filename={Hall (2005) - A Note On The Bias In Herfindahl Type Measures Based On Count Data.pdf}
}
File(s)
Abstract
A Herfindahl index of constructed from shares based on count data where the number of counts is small will generally be biased downward because of the statistical properties of count data and Jensens inequality. This note suggests a simple correction for the bias and illustrates its applicability when using measures based on patent data and patent citation data.
