Difference between revisions of "Knight, B. (2000), Supermajority Voting Requirements for Tax Increases"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Moshe |
|||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
+ | {{Article | ||
+ | |Has page= | ||
+ | |Has title= | ||
+ | |Has author= | ||
+ | |Has year= | ||
+ | |In journal= | ||
+ | |In volume= | ||
+ | |In number= | ||
+ | |Has pages= | ||
+ | |Has publisher= | ||
+ | }} | ||
Return to [[BPP Field Exam Papers 2012]] | Return to [[BPP Field Exam Papers 2012]] | ||
:Median legislator, member of pro-tax majority party, may want to limit his own party median power when setting agenda. in order to force a median outcome near his bliss point, he can team up with minority party and require super-majority. | :Median legislator, member of pro-tax majority party, may want to limit his own party median power when setting agenda. in order to force a median outcome near his bliss point, he can team up with minority party and require super-majority. |
Revision as of 11:48, 29 September 2020
Article | |
---|---|
Has bibtex key | |
Has article title | |
Has year | |
In journal | |
In volume | |
In number | |
Has pages | |
Has publisher | |
© edegan.com, 2016 |
Return to BPP Field Exam Papers 2012
- Median legislator, member of pro-tax majority party, may want to limit his own party median power when setting agenda. in order to force a median outcome near his bliss point, he can team up with minority party and require super-majority.
Assumption: Status quo policy is lower than median legislators bliss policy.
Research Question
Do super majority requirements have effect of lowering tax rate across states?
- if super majorities adopted where majority is pro-tax, then we might measure confounding effects.
- higher tax-rate from majority party being pro-tax
- lower tax rate from super majority.
Results
Both fixed effects (state/year) and IV(variation in state constitutional amendment rules) regressions show that super-majorities requirements significantly reduce tax-rate.