Difference between revisions of "Can Small Firms Mitigate their Disadvantages in Patent Litigation?"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
DylanDickens (talk | contribs) |
|||
Line 27: | Line 27: | ||
<includeonly> | <includeonly> | ||
[[Category: McNair Projects]] | [[Category: McNair Projects]] | ||
− | </includeonly> | + | </includeonly><!-- null edit dummy --> |
Revision as of 14:22, 22 June 2016
Can Small Firms Mitigate their Disadvantages in Patent Litigation? | |
---|---|
Project Information | |
Project Title | |
Start Date | |
Deadline | |
Primary Billing | |
Notes | |
Has project status | |
Copyright © 2016 edegan.com. All Rights Reserved. |
Abstract
An Academic Paper focused on the disproportionate patent litigation provided to small firms. Lex data will be used to acquire data on patent lawsuits.
Micro-entity under Leahy-Smith America Invents Act
Under section 123 of the United States Code Title 35 an applicant would qualify as micro entity if the applicant
- qualifies as small entity
- has not been named as inventor on more than 4 previously filed patent applictions with the exception of
- Applications filed in another country
- Provisional applications under section 111(b)
- International applications filed under the treaty defined in section 351(a) for which the basic national fee under section 41(a) was not paid
- The gross income in the calendar year preceding the calendar year in which the applicable fee is being paid does not exceed 3 times the median household income for that preceding calendar year, as most recently reported by the Bureau of the Census.