Difference between revisions of "Shepsle, K. (1979), Institutional Arrangements and Equilibrium in Multidimensional Voting Models"

From edegan.com
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Moshe
imported>Moshe
Line 1: Line 1:
[[Back to 2012 Field Exam Page|http://www.edegan.com/wiki/index.php/BPP_Field_Exam_Papers_2012]]
+
Back to [[BPP Field Exam Papers 2012]]  
 
==Paper's Motivation==
 
==Paper's Motivation==
  

Revision as of 13:29, 14 May 2012

Back to BPP Field Exam Papers 2012

Paper's Motivation

McKelvey's Chaos Thm: In a multidimensional spacial settings, unless points are distributed in a rare way (like radially symmetric), there is no Condorcet winner, and whoever controls the order of voting can make any point the final outcome.

In response, the author considers voting on one 'attribute' or dimension at a time.

Model

Consider a two-dimensional case. Any policy z_{i} is characterized by coordinates (x_i, y_i).

Result

In first stage we vote on x_{i}. and obtain policy equal to median voters bliss point x_m. In second stage we vote on y_i and obtain policy equal to median voters bliss point y_m, so we obtain unique outcome z=(x_m, y_m)