Difference between revisions of "Merges (1999) - Institutions For Intellectual Property Transactions"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Ed |
(No difference)
|
Revision as of 16:33, 18 March 2013
- This page is referenced in the Patent Thicket Literature Review
- This page is listed on the PTLR Core Papers page
Reference
- Merges, Robert P (1999), "Institutions for intellectual property transactions: the case of patent pools", University of California at Berkeley Working Paper
@article{merges1999institutions, title={Institutions for intellectual property transactions: the case of patent pools}, author={Merges, Robert P}, journal={University of California at Berkeley Working Paper}, year={1999}, abstract={In this Chapter I hope to accomplish three things: briefly summarize trends in the economic theory of intellectual property rights (IPRs); describe some ideas of my own on the emergence of IPR exchange institutions, and describe how an emphasis on institutions fits into existing theory; and ground these issues in a discussion of collective IPR licensing, in particular, patent pools. I begin with a discussion of how transactions have crept into IP theory, and then turn to an examination of actual institutions that have evolved out of the need for various industries to conduct a large volume of IPR transactions.}, discipline={Law}, research_type={Discussion}, industry={High-tech}, thicket_stance={}, thicket_stance_extract={}, thicket_def={}, thicket_def_extract={}, tags={Pools}, filename={Merges (1999) - Institutions For Intellectual Property Transactions.pdf} }
File(s)
Abstract
In this Chapter I hope to accomplish three things: briefly summarize trends in the economic theory of intellectual property rights (IPRs); describe some ideas of my own on the emergence of IPR exchange institutions, and describe how an emphasis on institutions fits into existing theory; and ground these issues in a discussion of collective IPR licensing, in particular, patent pools. I begin with a discussion of how transactions have crept into IP theory, and then turn to an examination of actual institutions that have evolved out of the need for various industries to conduct a large volume of IPR transactions.