Difference between revisions of "Can Small Firms Mitigate their Disadvantages in Patent Litigation?"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Billing Code Fix #1) |
|||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
|Audience=Academics, | |Audience=Academics, | ||
|Keywords=Innovation, Small Business, | |Keywords=Innovation, Small Business, | ||
| − | |Primary Billing= | + | |Primary Billing=AccMcNair01, |
}} | }} | ||
==Abstract== | ==Abstract== | ||
Revision as of 12:10, 21 June 2016
| Can Small Firms Mitigate their Disadvantages in Patent Litigation? | |
|---|---|
| Project Information | |
| Project Title | |
| Start Date | |
| Deadline | |
| Primary Billing | |
| Notes | |
| Has project status | |
| Copyright © 2016 edegan.com. All Rights Reserved. | |
Abstract
An Academic Paper focused on the disproportionate patent litigation provided to small firms. Lex data will be used to acquire data on patent lawsuits.
Micro-entity under Leahy-Smith America Invents Act
Under section 123 of the United States Code Title 35 an applicant would qualify as micro entity if the applicant
- qualifies as small entity
- has not been named as inventor on more than 4 previously filed patent applictions with the exception of
- Applications filed in another country
- Provisional applications under section 111(b)
- International applications filed under the treaty defined in section 351(a) for which the basic national fee under section 41(a) was not paid
- The gross income in the calendar year preceding the calendar year in which the applicable fee is being paid does not exceed 3 times the median household income for that preceding calendar year, as most recently reported by the Bureau of the Census.
