174
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Created page with "Triple helix Indicators of Knowledge-Based Innovation Systems by Pamela Mueller @article{mueller_exploring_2006, series = {Triple helix {Indicators} of {Knowledge}-{Base..."
Triple helix Indicators of Knowledge-Based Innovation Systems by Pamela Mueller
@article{mueller_exploring_2006,
series = {Triple helix {Indicators} of {Knowledge}-{Based} {Innovation} {Systems}},
title = {Exploring the knowledge filter: {How} entrepreneurship and university–industry relationships drive economic growth},
volume = {35},
issn = {0048-7333},
shorttitle = {Exploring the knowledge filter},
url = {http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048733306001600},
doi = {10.1016/j.respol.2006.09.023},
abstract = {Knowledge is recognized as a crucial element of economic growth in addition to physical capital and labor. Knowledge can be transformed into products and processes and is, in this way, exploited commercially. The ability to produce, identify, and exploit knowledge depends on the existing knowledge stock and the absorptive capacity of actors such as employees at firms and researchers at universities and research institutions. The existing knowledge stock might not be commercialized to its full extent; therefore, knowledge flows must occur and transmission channels are needed. The paper tests the hypotheses that entrepreneurship and university–industry relations are vehicles for knowledge flows and, thus, spur economic growth.},
number = {10},
urldate = {2017-02-24},
journal = {Research Policy},
author = {Mueller, Pamela},
month = dec,
year = {2006},
keywords = {Entrepreneurship, Knowledge, Regional growth},
pages = {1499--1508},
file = {ScienceDirect Full Text PDF:/Users/tonimasaleh/Library/Application Support/Zotero/Profiles/ujmvea1t.default/zotero/storage/QPNSTJGS/Mueller - 2006 - Exploring the knowledge filter How entrepreneursh.pdf:application/pdf;ScienceDirect Snapshot:/Users/tonimasaleh/Library/Application Support/Zotero/Profiles/ujmvea1t.default/zotero/storage/XWC3AJR9/Mueller - 2006 - Exploring the knowledge filter How entrepreneursh.html:text/html}
Innovation, Imitation, and Economic Growth by Pail Segerstrom
@article{segerstrom_innovation_1991,
title = {Innovation, {Imitation}, and {Economic} {Growth}},
volume = {99},
issn = {0022-3808},
url = {http://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/abs/10.1086/261779},
doi = {10.1086/261779},
abstract = {This paper develops a dynamic general equilibrium model of economic growth. The model has a steady-state equilibrium in which some firms devote resources to discovering qualitatively improved products and other firms devote resources to copying these products. Rates of both innovation and imitation are endogenously determined on the basis of the outcomes of \$R \& D\$ races between firms. Innovation subsidies are shown to unambiguously promote economic growth. Welfare is enhanced, however, only if the steady-state intensity of innovative effort exceeds a critical level.},
number = {4},
urldate = {2017-02-27},
journal = {Journal of Political Economy},
author = {Segerstrom, Paul S.},
month = aug,
year = {1991},
pages = {807--827},
file = {Snapshot:/Users/tonimasaleh/Library/Application Support/Zotero/Profiles/ujmvea1t.default/zotero/storage/ZAWEQ2JN/Segerstrom - 1991 - Innovation, Imitation, and Economic Growth.html:text/html}
Research on Technological Innovation, Management and Policy by David Audretsch
@incollection{audretsch_knowledge_2005,
series = {Research on {Technological} {Innovation}, {Management} and {Policy}},
title = {The {Knowledge} {Spillover} {Theory} of {Entrepreneurship} and {Economic} {Growth}},
volume = {9},
url = {http://www.emeraldinsight.com/doi/abs/10.1016/S0737-1071(05)09003-7},
number = {9},
urldate = {2017-02-24},
booktitle = {The {Emergence} of {Entrepreneurial} {Economics}},
publisher = {Emerald Group Publishing Limited},
author = {Audretsch, David B.},
month = jan,
year = {2005},
note = {DOI: 10.1016/S0737-1071(05)09003-7
DOI: 10.1016/S0737-1071(05)09003-7},
pages = {37--54},
file = {Snapshot:/Users/tonimasaleh/Library/Application Support/Zotero/Profiles/ujmvea1t.default/zotero/storage/VKFHNSNM/Audretsch - 2005 - The Knowledge Spillover Theory of Entrepreneurship.html:text/html}
The Economics of Science and Technology: An Overview of Initiatives to Foster Innovation, Entrepreneurship, and Economic Growth by M. P. Feldman, Albert Link, and Donald Siegel
@book{feldman_economics_2012,
title = {The {Economics} of {Science} and {Technology}: {An} {Overview} of {Initiatives} to {Foster} {Innovation}, {Entrepreneurship}, and {Economic} {Growth}},
isbn = {978-1-4615-0981-3},
shorttitle = {The {Economics} of {Science} and {Technology}},
abstract = {Science and technology have long been regarded as important determinants of economic growth. Edwin Mansfield (1971, pp. 1- 2), a pioneer in the economics of technological change, noted: Technological change is an important, if not the most important, factor responsible for economic growth . . . without question, [it] is one of the most important determinants of the shape and evolution of the American economy. Science and technology are even more important in the "new economy," with its greater emphasis on the role of intellectual property and knowledge transfer. Therefore, it is unfortunate that most individuals rarely have the opportunity to explore the economic implications of science and technology. As a result, the antecedents and consequences of technological change are poorly understood by many in the general public. This lack of understanding is reflected in a recent survey conducted by the National Science Board (2000), summarized in Science \& Engineering Indicators. ' As shown in Table 1. 1, the findings of the survey indicated that many Americans, despite a high level of interests in such matters, are not as well-informed about technological issues as they are about other policy issues. As shown in the table, individuals self assess, based on a scale from 1 to 100, their interest in science and technology policy issues as being relatively high, yet they self assess their knowledge or informedness about these issues relatively lower.},
language = {en},
publisher = {Springer Science \& Business Media},
author = {Feldman, M. P. and Link, Albert N. and Siegel, Donald},
month = dec,
year = {2012},
note = {Google-Books-ID: wca9BwAAQBAJ},
keywords = {Business \& Economics / Development / Economic Development, Business \& Economics / General, Business \& Economics / Management Science, Business \& Economics / Production \& Operations Management, Business \& Economics / Research \& Development, Political Science / Public Policy / Economic Policy}
Research on Technological Innovation, Management and Policy by David Audretsch
@incollection{audretsch_knowledge_2005-1,
series = {Research on {Technological} {Innovation}, {Management} and {Policy}},
title = {The {Knowledge} {Spillover} {Theory} of {Entrepreneurship} and {Economic} {Growth}},
volume = {9},
url = {http://www.emeraldinsight.com/doi/abs/10.1016/S0737-1071(05)09003-7},
number = {9},
urldate = {2017-02-24},
booktitle = {The {Emergence} of {Entrepreneurial} {Economics}},
publisher = {Emerald Group Publishing Limited},
author = {Audretsch, David B.},
month = jan,
year = {2005},
note = {DOI: 10.1016/S0737-1071(05)09003-7
DOI: 10.1016/S0737-1071(05)09003-7},
pages = {37--54},
file = {Snapshot:/Users/tonimasaleh/Library/Application Support/Zotero/Profiles/ujmvea1t.default/zotero/storage/8XPFGHW6/Audretsch - 2005 - The Knowledge Spillover Theory of Entrepreneurship.html:text/html}
The product market and the market for “ideas”: commercialization strategies for technology entrepreneurs by Joshua Gans and Scott Stern
@article{gans_product_2003,
series = {Special {Issue} on {Technology} {Entrepreneurship} and {Contact} {Information} for corresponding authors},
title = {The product market and the market for “ideas”: commercialization strategies for technology entrepreneurs},
volume = {32},
issn = {0048-7333},
shorttitle = {The product market and the market for “ideas”},
url = {http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048733302001038},
doi = {10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00103-8},
abstract = {This paper presents a synthetic framework identifying the central drivers of start-up commercialization strategy and the implications of these drivers for industrial dynamics. We link strategy to the commercialization environment—the microeconomic and strategic conditions facing a firm that is translating an “idea” into a value proposition for customers. The framework addresses why technology entrepreneurs in some environments undermine established firms, while others cooperate with incumbents and reinforce existing market power. Our analysis suggests that competitive interaction between start-up innovators and established firms depends on the presence or absence of a “market for ideas”. By focusing on the operating requirements, efficiency, and institutions associated with markets for ideas, this framework holds several implications for the management of high-technology entrepreneurial firms.},
number = {2},
urldate = {2017-03-27},
journal = {Research Policy},
author = {Gans, Joshua S. and Stern, Scott},
month = feb,
year = {2003},
keywords = {Appropriability, Commercialization strategies, Ideas market, Product market, Technology entrepreneurs},
pages = {333--350},
file = {ScienceDirect Full Text PDF:/Users/tonimasaleh/Library/Application Support/Zotero/Profiles/ujmvea1t.default/zotero/storage/BVZBMHTS/Gans and Stern - 2003 - The product market and the market for “ideas” com.pdf:application/pdf;ScienceDirect Snapshot:/Users/tonimasaleh/Library/Application Support/Zotero/Profiles/ujmvea1t.default/zotero/storage/BR8CUQAE/S0048733302001038.html:text/html}
Private Equity and Long-Run Investment: The Case of Innovation by Josh Lerner, Morten Sorensen, and Per Stromberg
@article{lerner_private_2011,
title = {Private {Equity} and {Long}-{Run} {Investment}: {The} {Case} of {Innovation}},
volume = {66},
issn = {1540-6261},
shorttitle = {Private {Equity} and {Long}-{Run} {Investment}},
url = {http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2010.01639.x/abstract},
doi = {10.1111/j.1540-6261.2010.01639.x},
abstract = {A long-standing controversy is whether leveraged buyouts (LBOs) relieve managers from short-term pressures from public shareholders, or whether LBO funds themselves sacrifice long-term growth to boost short-term performance. We examine one form of long-run activity, namely, investments in innovation as measured by patenting activity. Based on 472 LBO transactions, we find no evidence that LBOs sacrifice long-term investments. LBO firm patents are more cited (a proxy for economic importance), show no shifts in the fundamental nature of the research, and become more concentrated in important areas of companies' innovative portfolios.},
language = {en},
number = {2},
urldate = {2017-03-27},
journal = {The Journal of Finance},
author = {Lerner, Josh and Sorensen, Morten and Strömberg, Per},
month = apr,
year = {2011},
pages = {445--477},
file = {Full Text PDF:/Users/tonimasaleh/Library/Application Support/Zotero/Profiles/ujmvea1t.default/zotero/storage/FWCUXVTH/Lerner et al. - 2011 - Private Equity and Long-Run Investment The Case o.pdf:application/pdf;Snapshot:/Users/tonimasaleh/Library/Application Support/Zotero/Profiles/ujmvea1t.default/zotero/storage/NTXHVB2K/abstract.html:text/html}
Technological Opportunities and New Firm Creation by Scott Shane
@article{shane_technological_2001,
title = {Technological {Opportunities} and {New} {Firm} {Creation}},
volume = {47},
issn = {0025-1909},
url = {http://pubsonline.informs.org/doi/abs/10.1287/mnsc.47.2.205.9837},
doi = {10.1287/mnsc.47.2.205.9837},
abstract = {Research on the creation of new high-technology companies has typically focused either on industry-level factors such as market structure and technology regime or on individual-level factors such as the work experience of entrepreneurs. This study complements these approaches by examining the effect of technological opportunities on firm formation. In particular, the study shows that the probability that an invention will be commercialized through firm formation is influenced by its importance, radicalness, and patent scope.},
number = {2},
urldate = {2017-03-27},
journal = {Management Science},
author = {Shane, Scott},
month = feb,
year = {2001},
pages = {205--220},
file = {Full Text PDF:/Users/tonimasaleh/Library/Application Support/Zotero/Profiles/ujmvea1t.default/zotero/storage/NB3TMCIX/Shane - 2001 - Technological Opportunities and New Firm Creation.pdf:application/pdf;Snapshot:/Users/tonimasaleh/Library/Application Support/Zotero/Profiles/ujmvea1t.default/zotero/storage/XBGW3B4J/mnsc.47.2.205.html:text/html}
Empirical studies of innovation and market structure by Wesley Cohen and Richard Levin
@article{cohen_chapter_1989,
title = {Chapter 18 {Empirical} studies of innovation and market structure},
volume = {2},
issn = {1573-448X},
url = {http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1573448X89020066},
doi = {10.1016/S1573-448X(89)02006-6},
abstract = {This chapter discusses the perceptible movement of empirical scholars from a narrow concern with the role of firm size and market concentration toward a broader consideration of the fundamental determinants of technical change in industry. Although tastes, technological opportunity, and appropriability conditions themselves are subject to change over time, particularly in response to radical innovations that alter the technological regime, these conditions are reasonably assumed to determine inter-industry differences in innovative activity over relatively long periods. Although a substantial body of descriptive evidence has begun to accumulate on the way the nature and effects of demand, opportunity, and appropriability differ across industries, the absence of suitable data constrains progress in many areas. It has been observed that much of the empirical understanding of innovation derives not from the estimation of econometric models but from the use of other empirical methods. Many of the most credible empirical regularities have been established not by estimating and testing elaborate optimization models with published data but by the painstaking collection of original data, usually in the form of responses to relatively simple questions.},
urldate = {2017-03-27},
journal = {Handbook of Industrial Organization},
author = {Cohen, Wesley M. and Levin, Richard C.},
month = jan,
year = {1989},
pages = {1059--1107},
file = {ScienceDirect Snapshot:/Users/tonimasaleh/Library/Application Support/Zotero/Profiles/ujmvea1t.default/zotero/storage/SGM2ERHI/S1573448X89020066.html:text/html}
Entrepreneurship as Innovation by Joseph Schumpeter
@techreport{schumpeter_entrepreneurship_2000,
address = {Rochester, NY},
type = {{SSRN} {Scholarly} {Paper}},
title = {Entrepreneurship as {Innovation}},
url = {https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=1512266},
abstract = {The chief characteristics of the entrepreneur are identified, one of which is the ability to combine already existing resources in creative ways. Distinguishing},
number = {ID 1512266},
urldate = {2017-03-27},
institution = {Social Science Research Network},
author = {Schumpeter, Joseph A.},
year = {2000},
keywords = {Capitalism, Creativity, Individual traits, Industrial organization, Innovation process, Leadership, Motivation, Personal success},
file = {Snapshot:/Users/tonimasaleh/Library/Application Support/Zotero/Profiles/ujmvea1t.default/zotero/storage/3Q3Z47HA/papers.html:text/html}
Special Issue on Technology Entrepreneurship and Contact Information for corresponding authors by Joshua Gans and Scott Stern
@article{gans_product_2003-1,
series = {Special {Issue} on {Technology} {Entrepreneurship} and {Contact} {Information} for corresponding authors},
title = {The product market and the market for “ideas”: commercialization strategies for technology entrepreneurs},
volume = {32},
issn = {0048-7333},
shorttitle = {The product market and the market for “ideas”},
url = {http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048733302001038},
doi = {10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00103-8},
abstract = {This paper presents a synthetic framework identifying the central drivers of start-up commercialization strategy and the implications of these drivers for industrial dynamics. We link strategy to the commercialization environment—the microeconomic and strategic conditions facing a firm that is translating an “idea” into a value proposition for customers. The framework addresses why technology entrepreneurs in some environments undermine established firms, while others cooperate with incumbents and reinforce existing market power. Our analysis suggests that competitive interaction between start-up innovators and established firms depends on the presence or absence of a “market for ideas”. By focusing on the operating requirements, efficiency, and institutions associated with markets for ideas, this framework holds several implications for the management of high-technology entrepreneurial firms.},
number = {2},
urldate = {2017-03-27},
journal = {Research Policy},
author = {Gans, Joshua S. and Stern, Scott},
month = feb,
year = {2003},
keywords = {Appropriability, Commercialization strategies, Ideas market, Product market, Technology entrepreneurs},
pages = {333--350},
file = {ScienceDirect Full Text PDF:/Users/tonimasaleh/Library/Application Support/Zotero/Profiles/ujmvea1t.default/zotero/storage/KA9BZJQ2/Gans and Stern - 2003 - The product market and the market for “ideas” com.pdf:application/pdf;ScienceDirect Snapshot:/Users/tonimasaleh/Library/Application Support/Zotero/Profiles/ujmvea1t.default/zotero/storage/6HDNNZFW/S0048733302001038.html:text/html}
@article{mueller_exploring_2006,
series = {Triple helix {Indicators} of {Knowledge}-{Based} {Innovation} {Systems}},
title = {Exploring the knowledge filter: {How} entrepreneurship and university–industry relationships drive economic growth},
volume = {35},
issn = {0048-7333},
shorttitle = {Exploring the knowledge filter},
url = {http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048733306001600},
doi = {10.1016/j.respol.2006.09.023},
abstract = {Knowledge is recognized as a crucial element of economic growth in addition to physical capital and labor. Knowledge can be transformed into products and processes and is, in this way, exploited commercially. The ability to produce, identify, and exploit knowledge depends on the existing knowledge stock and the absorptive capacity of actors such as employees at firms and researchers at universities and research institutions. The existing knowledge stock might not be commercialized to its full extent; therefore, knowledge flows must occur and transmission channels are needed. The paper tests the hypotheses that entrepreneurship and university–industry relations are vehicles for knowledge flows and, thus, spur economic growth.},
number = {10},
urldate = {2017-02-24},
journal = {Research Policy},
author = {Mueller, Pamela},
month = dec,
year = {2006},
keywords = {Entrepreneurship, Knowledge, Regional growth},
pages = {1499--1508},
file = {ScienceDirect Full Text PDF:/Users/tonimasaleh/Library/Application Support/Zotero/Profiles/ujmvea1t.default/zotero/storage/QPNSTJGS/Mueller - 2006 - Exploring the knowledge filter How entrepreneursh.pdf:application/pdf;ScienceDirect Snapshot:/Users/tonimasaleh/Library/Application Support/Zotero/Profiles/ujmvea1t.default/zotero/storage/XWC3AJR9/Mueller - 2006 - Exploring the knowledge filter How entrepreneursh.html:text/html}
Innovation, Imitation, and Economic Growth by Pail Segerstrom
@article{segerstrom_innovation_1991,
title = {Innovation, {Imitation}, and {Economic} {Growth}},
volume = {99},
issn = {0022-3808},
url = {http://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/abs/10.1086/261779},
doi = {10.1086/261779},
abstract = {This paper develops a dynamic general equilibrium model of economic growth. The model has a steady-state equilibrium in which some firms devote resources to discovering qualitatively improved products and other firms devote resources to copying these products. Rates of both innovation and imitation are endogenously determined on the basis of the outcomes of \$R \& D\$ races between firms. Innovation subsidies are shown to unambiguously promote economic growth. Welfare is enhanced, however, only if the steady-state intensity of innovative effort exceeds a critical level.},
number = {4},
urldate = {2017-02-27},
journal = {Journal of Political Economy},
author = {Segerstrom, Paul S.},
month = aug,
year = {1991},
pages = {807--827},
file = {Snapshot:/Users/tonimasaleh/Library/Application Support/Zotero/Profiles/ujmvea1t.default/zotero/storage/ZAWEQ2JN/Segerstrom - 1991 - Innovation, Imitation, and Economic Growth.html:text/html}
Research on Technological Innovation, Management and Policy by David Audretsch
@incollection{audretsch_knowledge_2005,
series = {Research on {Technological} {Innovation}, {Management} and {Policy}},
title = {The {Knowledge} {Spillover} {Theory} of {Entrepreneurship} and {Economic} {Growth}},
volume = {9},
url = {http://www.emeraldinsight.com/doi/abs/10.1016/S0737-1071(05)09003-7},
number = {9},
urldate = {2017-02-24},
booktitle = {The {Emergence} of {Entrepreneurial} {Economics}},
publisher = {Emerald Group Publishing Limited},
author = {Audretsch, David B.},
month = jan,
year = {2005},
note = {DOI: 10.1016/S0737-1071(05)09003-7
DOI: 10.1016/S0737-1071(05)09003-7},
pages = {37--54},
file = {Snapshot:/Users/tonimasaleh/Library/Application Support/Zotero/Profiles/ujmvea1t.default/zotero/storage/VKFHNSNM/Audretsch - 2005 - The Knowledge Spillover Theory of Entrepreneurship.html:text/html}
The Economics of Science and Technology: An Overview of Initiatives to Foster Innovation, Entrepreneurship, and Economic Growth by M. P. Feldman, Albert Link, and Donald Siegel
@book{feldman_economics_2012,
title = {The {Economics} of {Science} and {Technology}: {An} {Overview} of {Initiatives} to {Foster} {Innovation}, {Entrepreneurship}, and {Economic} {Growth}},
isbn = {978-1-4615-0981-3},
shorttitle = {The {Economics} of {Science} and {Technology}},
abstract = {Science and technology have long been regarded as important determinants of economic growth. Edwin Mansfield (1971, pp. 1- 2), a pioneer in the economics of technological change, noted: Technological change is an important, if not the most important, factor responsible for economic growth . . . without question, [it] is one of the most important determinants of the shape and evolution of the American economy. Science and technology are even more important in the "new economy," with its greater emphasis on the role of intellectual property and knowledge transfer. Therefore, it is unfortunate that most individuals rarely have the opportunity to explore the economic implications of science and technology. As a result, the antecedents and consequences of technological change are poorly understood by many in the general public. This lack of understanding is reflected in a recent survey conducted by the National Science Board (2000), summarized in Science \& Engineering Indicators. ' As shown in Table 1. 1, the findings of the survey indicated that many Americans, despite a high level of interests in such matters, are not as well-informed about technological issues as they are about other policy issues. As shown in the table, individuals self assess, based on a scale from 1 to 100, their interest in science and technology policy issues as being relatively high, yet they self assess their knowledge or informedness about these issues relatively lower.},
language = {en},
publisher = {Springer Science \& Business Media},
author = {Feldman, M. P. and Link, Albert N. and Siegel, Donald},
month = dec,
year = {2012},
note = {Google-Books-ID: wca9BwAAQBAJ},
keywords = {Business \& Economics / Development / Economic Development, Business \& Economics / General, Business \& Economics / Management Science, Business \& Economics / Production \& Operations Management, Business \& Economics / Research \& Development, Political Science / Public Policy / Economic Policy}
Research on Technological Innovation, Management and Policy by David Audretsch
@incollection{audretsch_knowledge_2005-1,
series = {Research on {Technological} {Innovation}, {Management} and {Policy}},
title = {The {Knowledge} {Spillover} {Theory} of {Entrepreneurship} and {Economic} {Growth}},
volume = {9},
url = {http://www.emeraldinsight.com/doi/abs/10.1016/S0737-1071(05)09003-7},
number = {9},
urldate = {2017-02-24},
booktitle = {The {Emergence} of {Entrepreneurial} {Economics}},
publisher = {Emerald Group Publishing Limited},
author = {Audretsch, David B.},
month = jan,
year = {2005},
note = {DOI: 10.1016/S0737-1071(05)09003-7
DOI: 10.1016/S0737-1071(05)09003-7},
pages = {37--54},
file = {Snapshot:/Users/tonimasaleh/Library/Application Support/Zotero/Profiles/ujmvea1t.default/zotero/storage/8XPFGHW6/Audretsch - 2005 - The Knowledge Spillover Theory of Entrepreneurship.html:text/html}
The product market and the market for “ideas”: commercialization strategies for technology entrepreneurs by Joshua Gans and Scott Stern
@article{gans_product_2003,
series = {Special {Issue} on {Technology} {Entrepreneurship} and {Contact} {Information} for corresponding authors},
title = {The product market and the market for “ideas”: commercialization strategies for technology entrepreneurs},
volume = {32},
issn = {0048-7333},
shorttitle = {The product market and the market for “ideas”},
url = {http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048733302001038},
doi = {10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00103-8},
abstract = {This paper presents a synthetic framework identifying the central drivers of start-up commercialization strategy and the implications of these drivers for industrial dynamics. We link strategy to the commercialization environment—the microeconomic and strategic conditions facing a firm that is translating an “idea” into a value proposition for customers. The framework addresses why technology entrepreneurs in some environments undermine established firms, while others cooperate with incumbents and reinforce existing market power. Our analysis suggests that competitive interaction between start-up innovators and established firms depends on the presence or absence of a “market for ideas”. By focusing on the operating requirements, efficiency, and institutions associated with markets for ideas, this framework holds several implications for the management of high-technology entrepreneurial firms.},
number = {2},
urldate = {2017-03-27},
journal = {Research Policy},
author = {Gans, Joshua S. and Stern, Scott},
month = feb,
year = {2003},
keywords = {Appropriability, Commercialization strategies, Ideas market, Product market, Technology entrepreneurs},
pages = {333--350},
file = {ScienceDirect Full Text PDF:/Users/tonimasaleh/Library/Application Support/Zotero/Profiles/ujmvea1t.default/zotero/storage/BVZBMHTS/Gans and Stern - 2003 - The product market and the market for “ideas” com.pdf:application/pdf;ScienceDirect Snapshot:/Users/tonimasaleh/Library/Application Support/Zotero/Profiles/ujmvea1t.default/zotero/storage/BR8CUQAE/S0048733302001038.html:text/html}
Private Equity and Long-Run Investment: The Case of Innovation by Josh Lerner, Morten Sorensen, and Per Stromberg
@article{lerner_private_2011,
title = {Private {Equity} and {Long}-{Run} {Investment}: {The} {Case} of {Innovation}},
volume = {66},
issn = {1540-6261},
shorttitle = {Private {Equity} and {Long}-{Run} {Investment}},
url = {http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2010.01639.x/abstract},
doi = {10.1111/j.1540-6261.2010.01639.x},
abstract = {A long-standing controversy is whether leveraged buyouts (LBOs) relieve managers from short-term pressures from public shareholders, or whether LBO funds themselves sacrifice long-term growth to boost short-term performance. We examine one form of long-run activity, namely, investments in innovation as measured by patenting activity. Based on 472 LBO transactions, we find no evidence that LBOs sacrifice long-term investments. LBO firm patents are more cited (a proxy for economic importance), show no shifts in the fundamental nature of the research, and become more concentrated in important areas of companies' innovative portfolios.},
language = {en},
number = {2},
urldate = {2017-03-27},
journal = {The Journal of Finance},
author = {Lerner, Josh and Sorensen, Morten and Strömberg, Per},
month = apr,
year = {2011},
pages = {445--477},
file = {Full Text PDF:/Users/tonimasaleh/Library/Application Support/Zotero/Profiles/ujmvea1t.default/zotero/storage/FWCUXVTH/Lerner et al. - 2011 - Private Equity and Long-Run Investment The Case o.pdf:application/pdf;Snapshot:/Users/tonimasaleh/Library/Application Support/Zotero/Profiles/ujmvea1t.default/zotero/storage/NTXHVB2K/abstract.html:text/html}
Technological Opportunities and New Firm Creation by Scott Shane
@article{shane_technological_2001,
title = {Technological {Opportunities} and {New} {Firm} {Creation}},
volume = {47},
issn = {0025-1909},
url = {http://pubsonline.informs.org/doi/abs/10.1287/mnsc.47.2.205.9837},
doi = {10.1287/mnsc.47.2.205.9837},
abstract = {Research on the creation of new high-technology companies has typically focused either on industry-level factors such as market structure and technology regime or on individual-level factors such as the work experience of entrepreneurs. This study complements these approaches by examining the effect of technological opportunities on firm formation. In particular, the study shows that the probability that an invention will be commercialized through firm formation is influenced by its importance, radicalness, and patent scope.},
number = {2},
urldate = {2017-03-27},
journal = {Management Science},
author = {Shane, Scott},
month = feb,
year = {2001},
pages = {205--220},
file = {Full Text PDF:/Users/tonimasaleh/Library/Application Support/Zotero/Profiles/ujmvea1t.default/zotero/storage/NB3TMCIX/Shane - 2001 - Technological Opportunities and New Firm Creation.pdf:application/pdf;Snapshot:/Users/tonimasaleh/Library/Application Support/Zotero/Profiles/ujmvea1t.default/zotero/storage/XBGW3B4J/mnsc.47.2.205.html:text/html}
Empirical studies of innovation and market structure by Wesley Cohen and Richard Levin
@article{cohen_chapter_1989,
title = {Chapter 18 {Empirical} studies of innovation and market structure},
volume = {2},
issn = {1573-448X},
url = {http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1573448X89020066},
doi = {10.1016/S1573-448X(89)02006-6},
abstract = {This chapter discusses the perceptible movement of empirical scholars from a narrow concern with the role of firm size and market concentration toward a broader consideration of the fundamental determinants of technical change in industry. Although tastes, technological opportunity, and appropriability conditions themselves are subject to change over time, particularly in response to radical innovations that alter the technological regime, these conditions are reasonably assumed to determine inter-industry differences in innovative activity over relatively long periods. Although a substantial body of descriptive evidence has begun to accumulate on the way the nature and effects of demand, opportunity, and appropriability differ across industries, the absence of suitable data constrains progress in many areas. It has been observed that much of the empirical understanding of innovation derives not from the estimation of econometric models but from the use of other empirical methods. Many of the most credible empirical regularities have been established not by estimating and testing elaborate optimization models with published data but by the painstaking collection of original data, usually in the form of responses to relatively simple questions.},
urldate = {2017-03-27},
journal = {Handbook of Industrial Organization},
author = {Cohen, Wesley M. and Levin, Richard C.},
month = jan,
year = {1989},
pages = {1059--1107},
file = {ScienceDirect Snapshot:/Users/tonimasaleh/Library/Application Support/Zotero/Profiles/ujmvea1t.default/zotero/storage/SGM2ERHI/S1573448X89020066.html:text/html}
Entrepreneurship as Innovation by Joseph Schumpeter
@techreport{schumpeter_entrepreneurship_2000,
address = {Rochester, NY},
type = {{SSRN} {Scholarly} {Paper}},
title = {Entrepreneurship as {Innovation}},
url = {https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=1512266},
abstract = {The chief characteristics of the entrepreneur are identified, one of which is the ability to combine already existing resources in creative ways. Distinguishing},
number = {ID 1512266},
urldate = {2017-03-27},
institution = {Social Science Research Network},
author = {Schumpeter, Joseph A.},
year = {2000},
keywords = {Capitalism, Creativity, Individual traits, Industrial organization, Innovation process, Leadership, Motivation, Personal success},
file = {Snapshot:/Users/tonimasaleh/Library/Application Support/Zotero/Profiles/ujmvea1t.default/zotero/storage/3Q3Z47HA/papers.html:text/html}
Special Issue on Technology Entrepreneurship and Contact Information for corresponding authors by Joshua Gans and Scott Stern
@article{gans_product_2003-1,
series = {Special {Issue} on {Technology} {Entrepreneurship} and {Contact} {Information} for corresponding authors},
title = {The product market and the market for “ideas”: commercialization strategies for technology entrepreneurs},
volume = {32},
issn = {0048-7333},
shorttitle = {The product market and the market for “ideas”},
url = {http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048733302001038},
doi = {10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00103-8},
abstract = {This paper presents a synthetic framework identifying the central drivers of start-up commercialization strategy and the implications of these drivers for industrial dynamics. We link strategy to the commercialization environment—the microeconomic and strategic conditions facing a firm that is translating an “idea” into a value proposition for customers. The framework addresses why technology entrepreneurs in some environments undermine established firms, while others cooperate with incumbents and reinforce existing market power. Our analysis suggests that competitive interaction between start-up innovators and established firms depends on the presence or absence of a “market for ideas”. By focusing on the operating requirements, efficiency, and institutions associated with markets for ideas, this framework holds several implications for the management of high-technology entrepreneurial firms.},
number = {2},
urldate = {2017-03-27},
journal = {Research Policy},
author = {Gans, Joshua S. and Stern, Scott},
month = feb,
year = {2003},
keywords = {Appropriability, Commercialization strategies, Ideas market, Product market, Technology entrepreneurs},
pages = {333--350},
file = {ScienceDirect Full Text PDF:/Users/tonimasaleh/Library/Application Support/Zotero/Profiles/ujmvea1t.default/zotero/storage/KA9BZJQ2/Gans and Stern - 2003 - The product market and the market for “ideas” com.pdf:application/pdf;ScienceDirect Snapshot:/Users/tonimasaleh/Library/Application Support/Zotero/Profiles/ujmvea1t.default/zotero/storage/6HDNNZFW/S0048733302001038.html:text/html}
